Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9028 total)
38 online now:
PaulK (1 member, 37 visitors)
Newest Member: Michael MD
Post Volume: Total: 884,212 Year: 1,858/14,102 Month: 226/624 Week: 110/95 Day: 1/38 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What are acceptable sources of "scientific knowledge"?
Admin
Director
Posts: 12715
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 2 of 38 (724901)
04-22-2014 8:58 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Ben!
04-21-2014 12:11 PM


I'll promote this and suggest narrowing the focus to your first step:

Ben! writes:

First step: understanding better what exactly science-types think of as "knowledge"--what is it and where does it come from? This includes questions like:


  • When we request each other to provide evidence in an argument, should we be referring to source papers that contain original data, or is referring to authorities good enough?

  • If it's good enough, when and why is that the case?

  • Is scientific knowledge the set of all source data in the literature, or is it the set of inferences and conclusions that have been generally agreed upon by the scientific community, based on those data?


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Ben!, posted 04-21-2014 12:11 PM Ben! has not yet responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12715
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 3 of 38 (724903)
04-22-2014 8:58 AM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the What are acceptable sources of "scientific knowledge"? thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021