Of COURSE it is not how they believe evolution works, they haven't NOTICED that there is a genetic cost to evolution, I AM TRYING TO POINT THIS OUT.
So, you are saying that all the biologists in the world, who are studying living organisms and writing about their observations, have never noticed your genetic cost to evolution
, but you have?
Not one of the people actually studying evolution, in the last 150 years, not one of the people studying genetics, or population dynamics, or any of the specialties involved, has noticed what you discovered all by yourself, without ever studying a single population of a single species ever in your whole life?
Dawkins makes his little model of "evolution" in which these little figures just keep changing and changing and changing as if there were no end to it. The language in which evolution is described pictures an ever-upward process of change.
Can you point to a single species where change is not happening? As far as I know the only species which have stopped changing are extinct. I have not seen any studies of endangered species, that are approaching extinction or ones that have already gone extinct where the cause was shown to be the genetic cost of evolution
Populations go extinct from many causes that reduce the number of breeding pairs, but I have never seen a study that concludes that "they just naturally ran out of genetic diversity and ran into the 'end of evolution', just like that genius Faith said they would."
After all "Faith's Rule" clearly states that "it is absolutely inevitable that phenotypic change is accompanied genetic reduction and variation can never be replaced or increased."
Since they (all the scientists in the world) don't take this into account their versions of evolution are severely flawed.
I am completely overwhelmed and in awe of your brilliance and insight. There must be hoards of potential grad students clambering to study under you. Scientific journals around the world must be showering you with requests to publish the results of you ground-breaking research. You must be swamped with invitations to speak at universities and conferences.
So this certainly IS an argument against the Theory of Evolution, the TRUE evolution, what REALLY happens in evolution, which ought to be recognizable with a little work. Not to mention honesty.
Everyone knows how honest you are.
I am sure that Peter and Rosemary Grant are already grateful for your insightful discoveries about "the TRUE evolution, what REALLY happens in evolution, which ought to be recognizable with a little work."
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy