EvC Forum: Continuation of Flood Discussion

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Continuation of Flood Discussion

New Cat's Eye

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 140 of 535 (730864)
05-09-2014 10:48 AM

NN says everybody has thought about my arguments and they don't work. That's what everybody always says and then you show you don't have a clue as NN did on the thread about genetic diversity, not a clue. Or RAZD either. At least stop thinking you get it when you don't.

That's just what you say when you've been proven utterly wrong.

**hey guys, know what? The sky is green.

-Um, no. Look at this picture, its blue

**YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M SAYING

Your ideas are not that hard to follow, they're just incredibly misguided and painfully wrong.

New Cat's Eye

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 192 of 535 (730916)
05-12-2014 10:10 AM

Re: To edge: no tectonic activity in Grand Canyon Paleozoic

I AM right about this and you WOULD see it if you would just think.

New Cat's Eye

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 195 of 535 (730919)
05-12-2014 10:42 AM

Re: To edge: no tectonic activity in Grand Canyon Paleozoic

When you're trying to convince someone of something, you show them the evidence for your assertion. You don't just tell them that you are right and that they would know it if they thought about it.

New Cat's Eye

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 223 of 535 (730947)
05-13-2014 10:14 AM

Re: To edge: no tectonic activity in Grand Canyon Paleozoic

It doesn't matter if a particular layer thickens or thins, I keep trying to say that, the point is that they ALL FOLLOW THAT CURVY PATH SHOWN ON THE DIAGRAM as a blocki.

What did you expect?

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

2 online now:	Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), Tangle
Newest Member:	popoi
Post Volume:	Total: 916,334 Year: 3,591/9,624 Month: 462/974 Week: 75/276 Day: 3/23 Hour: 0/2