Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8937 total)
33 online now:
Aussie, Diomedes, DrJones*, PaulK, Tanypteryx, Theodoric (6 members, 27 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: ssope
Happy Birthday: AdminPhat
Post Volume: Total: 861,775 Year: 16,811/19,786 Month: 936/2,598 Week: 182/251 Day: 11/59 Hour: 1/1

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Black Holes Don't Exist
Posts: 5473
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 3.0

Message 144 of 174 (742542)
11-21-2014 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 143 by Percy
11-21-2014 8:55 AM

Re: Reminding Zaius of what's already been explained
Well Son says “vacuum catastrophe” does not exist, never has. Because a paper points out that it is all imagination. Hopeless..

The term hopeless more appropriately applies to someone who objects to certain conclusions because they appeared in a technical paper (that they haven't read) while ignoring the fact that their own claims also appeared in technical papers (that are nearly a half century old and that in all likelihood they also haven't read).

Plus, of course, the fact that Son never said the problem never existed; he acknowledged that it existed and explained why it no longer exists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Percy, posted 11-21-2014 8:55 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019