Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (9005 total)
48 online now:
AZPaul3, jar, JonF (3 members, 45 visitors)
Newest Member: kanthesh
Post Volume: Total: 881,194 Year: 12,942/23,288 Month: 667/1,527 Week: 106/240 Day: 5/29 Hour: 0/0

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Black Holes Don't Exist
Posts: 6169
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 1.6

Message 144 of 174 (742542)
11-21-2014 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 143 by Percy
11-21-2014 8:55 AM

Re: Reminding Zaius of what's already been explained
Well Son says “vacuum catastrophe” does not exist, never has. Because a paper points out that it is all imagination. Hopeless..

The term hopeless more appropriately applies to someone who objects to certain conclusions because they appeared in a technical paper (that they haven't read) while ignoring the fact that their own claims also appeared in technical papers (that are nearly a half century old and that in all likelihood they also haven't read).

Plus, of course, the fact that Son never said the problem never existed; he acknowledged that it existed and explained why it no longer exists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Percy, posted 11-21-2014 8:55 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020