|
Author
|
Topic: A measured look at a difficult situation
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
(2)
| |
| |
| |
|
Message 71 of 289 (747840)
01-20-2015 10:22 AM
|
Reply to: Message 48 by Faith
01-19-2015 2:22 PM
|
|
Re: Crime and its punishment aren't the same thing
Their authority was legitimate because they WERE in power. So if Sharia law was forced upon America through armed conflict after a declaration of war and subsequent occupation Sharia law would be legitimate from your perspective? All the best.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 48 by Faith, posted 01-19-2015 2:22 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 74 by Faith, posted 01-20-2015 10:42 AM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 97 of 289 (747912)
01-20-2015 5:57 PM
|
Reply to: Message 74 by Faith
01-20-2015 10:42 AM
|
|
Re: Crime and its punishment aren't the same thing
So might makes right? I guess we can only expect as much from a worshiper of Yahweh. All the best.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 74 by Faith, posted 01-20-2015 10:42 AM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 100 by Faith, posted 01-20-2015 8:02 PM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 98 of 289 (747913)
01-20-2015 6:02 PM
|
Reply to: Message 82 by Faith
01-20-2015 11:37 AM
|
|
Re: Crime and its punishment aren't the same thing
I beleive the proddies may have burnt a few Catholics in their time. So called 'witches', too. And let's not forget the denomination of abortion clinic destructivatorz. Faith, have you heard of selective attention? All the best.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 82 by Faith, posted 01-20-2015 11:37 AM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 99 by Faith, posted 01-20-2015 8:00 PM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 113 of 289 (747955)
01-21-2015 12:00 PM
|
Reply to: Message 100 by Faith
01-20-2015 8:02 PM
|
|
Re: Crime and its punishment aren't the same thing
Then what you are desribing is not a moral authority but an authority based on force of arms. Is that really what you mean? A question for you: how many Catholics did Henry VIII, Edward VI kill during their reign? Have you actual had any formal education in that time period in UK (not just surfing the World Wide Web)? Even though I was educated in a C of E school we were taught who killed who in history lessons. All the best. Edited by Larni, : No reason given. Edited by Larni, : added 'kill' to second paragraph
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 100 by Faith, posted 01-20-2015 8:02 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 116 by Faith, posted 01-21-2015 12:26 PM | | Larni has not replied | | | Message 117 by Faith, posted 01-21-2015 12:27 PM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 121 of 289 (747966)
01-21-2015 1:40 PM
|
Reply to: Message 117 by Faith
01-21-2015 12:27 PM
|
|
Re: Crime and its punishment aren't the same thing
My apologies. I have edited my post to make it more clear. C of E means Church of England in the context of English schools. I hope this helps. All the best.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 117 by Faith, posted 01-21-2015 12:27 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 128 by Faith, posted 01-21-2015 5:17 PM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 139 of 289 (748024)
01-22-2015 5:41 AM
|
Reply to: Message 128 by Faith
01-21-2015 5:17 PM
|
|
Re: Crime and its punishment aren't the same thing
About ten thousand Catholics were massacred during the two reigns. You might not like thinking about something that paints your tribe in a bad way but that is not history's fault.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 128 by Faith, posted 01-21-2015 5:17 PM | | Faith has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 146 of 289 (748076)
01-22-2015 1:23 PM
|
Reply to: Message 140 by Faith
01-22-2015 10:15 AM
|
|
Re: Crime and its punishment aren't the same thing
Here, take a look.
Click here Hope that helps. ABE: but I know it won't help. You will say: "I don't trust that source". Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 140 by Faith, posted 01-22-2015 10:15 AM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 151 by Faith, posted 01-22-2015 4:24 PM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 207 of 289 (748755)
01-29-2015 8:33 AM
|
Reply to: Message 205 by Faith
01-29-2015 1:17 AM
|
|
Since they just ARE Catholic-Protestant events, while I accept that they occurred in a broader political context, I still have to keep their religious nature in mind. Unless in Proddy on Catho violence, of course. All the best.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 205 by Faith, posted 01-29-2015 1:17 AM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 208 by Faith, posted 01-29-2015 11:19 AM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 218 of 289 (748819)
01-29-2015 4:45 PM
|
Reply to: Message 217 by Faith
01-29-2015 4:20 PM
|
|
Thank you, that is finally genuine information that makes your case after a lot of irrelevant stuff. I thought you did not trust wiki as a source?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 217 by Faith, posted 01-29-2015 4:20 PM | | Faith has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 248 of 289 (749214)
02-03-2015 4:45 AM
|
Reply to: Message 247 by Faith
02-03-2015 3:59 AM
|
|
Faith, you are not saying you may be right, you are saying that anyone who does not agree with is you is wrong. Arrogant much?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 247 by Faith, posted 02-03-2015 3:59 AM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 249 by Faith, posted 02-03-2015 5:00 AM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 250 of 289 (749220)
02-03-2015 8:46 AM
|
Reply to: Message 249 by Faith
02-03-2015 5:00 AM
|
|
Faith you implied that NoNuke denied the possibility that you could be right and that that was unfair. I showed how you denied the possibility that you could be wrong. Do you understand?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 249 by Faith, posted 02-03-2015 5:00 AM | | Faith has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 264 of 289 (749334)
02-03-2015 6:11 PM
|
Reply to: Message 261 by Faith
02-03-2015 4:26 PM
|
|
There is no reason for me to make it up, There are two, off the top of my head: selective attention and confirmation bias.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 261 by Faith, posted 02-03-2015 4:26 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 265 by Faith, posted 02-03-2015 6:16 PM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 266 of 289 (749337)
02-03-2015 6:20 PM
|
Reply to: Message 265 by Faith
02-03-2015 6:16 PM
|
|
I wrote that post before you corrected yourself. But I take on board your correction.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 265 by Faith, posted 02-03-2015 6:16 PM | | Faith has seen this message but not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 267 by NoNukes, posted 02-04-2015 2:45 AM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 272 of 289 (749519)
02-05-2015 1:09 PM
|
Reply to: Message 271 by Faith
02-05-2015 12:54 PM
|
|
Faith, if you approach is to defend what you mis hear and refuse to read anything that might contradict the thing you mis heard exactly how accurate a conclusion do you expect to arrive at?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 271 by Faith, posted 02-05-2015 12:54 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 273 by Faith, posted 02-05-2015 1:13 PM | | Larni has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2