Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 88 (8993 total)
53 online now:
CosmicChimp, ringo (2 members, 51 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,183 Year: 10,931/23,288 Month: 183/1,763 Week: 150/390 Day: 39/32 Hour: 3/0

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   What constitutes a fact in evolutionary biology?
Junior Member (Idle past 1145 days)
Posts: 11
Joined: 01-30-2015

Message 1 of 5 (748878)
01-30-2015 3:33 PM

When reading the debate between creationists and "evolutionists," I often get impression that the creationist side does not know what parts of evolution are regarded as facts and and what are not.

As I understand it, facts in evolutionary biology are such as these: all living things have a common universal ancestor, all verterbrates are (relatively closely) related and things like that.

I'm a layperson myself, and not particularly well-educated on the subject, but it seems to me that new findings reported by popular newspapers sometimes get a new "spin" the original publishers didn't mean to give... Like "A new ancestor of humans (or a species X) discovered" when what the researchers actually say is that they consider the new finding a relatively close relative of the ancestral species, possibly even the ancestor itself. And that it's not possible to draw a precise family tree and call it a fact, but they have a very good reason to believe their interpretation is "in the ballpark."

This seems a common thread on many forums where evolution and creationism is debated. Maybe it would be beneficial to us laypersons if somebody gave us a short introduction to the subject?

EDIT: Since the moderator deemed 'Is it science' the correct forum for this question, Id like to clarify that I DO believe the evolution theory is a) science b) correct about the common ancestors (In other words, yes chimps are my distant cousins)

Edited by Emotive, : Clarification about my own opinion on the debate

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by NoNukes, posted 02-01-2015 9:27 AM Emotive has not yet responded
 Message 4 by ringo, posted 02-01-2015 1:23 PM Emotive has not yet responded
 Message 5 by RAZD, posted 02-02-2015 11:09 AM Emotive has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020