Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,801 Year: 4,058/9,624 Month: 929/974 Week: 256/286 Day: 17/46 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Oh No, The New Awesome Primary Thread
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 426 of 1639 (773658)
12-06-2015 1:20 AM
Reply to: Message 422 by Dr Adequate
12-05-2015 2:02 PM


Re: Is Trump A Fascist?
So you know, people talk about fascism like its a bad thing. But they won a lot. They won a lot. And we don't win anymore. We don't. And what's the problem with fascism? They say it like its a bad thing. Like its a PC thing! It's always about tone now. But you know what? I'm not worried about tone, so let them write whatever they want about fascism because they don't know what they're talking about.
Well, that's a stunning admission. Yes, he's a fascist and, yes, he is a dangerously unstable human being who everyone should be terrified of to have control over a nuclear arsenal. I can imagine anyone thinking he'd be a good presidential candidate except for an extreme fringe of the rightwing.

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 422 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-05-2015 2:02 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 428 by ringo, posted 12-06-2015 1:20 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 450 of 1639 (775591)
01-03-2016 2:12 AM
Reply to: Message 449 by LamarkNewAge
01-02-2016 9:44 PM


Re: Trump vs. Clinton polls (and other current polls Jan 2016)
Presidential polling is pure bullshit.
And if my choices are Clinton or Trump, I choose armed revolution.

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 449 by LamarkNewAge, posted 01-02-2016 9:44 PM LamarkNewAge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 451 by Theodoric, posted 01-03-2016 11:50 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 452 by LamarkNewAge, posted 01-03-2016 1:40 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 455 by NoNukes, posted 01-04-2016 9:09 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 456 by ringo, posted 01-04-2016 11:36 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 458 of 1639 (776216)
01-10-2016 4:59 AM
Reply to: Message 451 by Theodoric
01-03-2016 11:50 AM


Re: Trump vs. Clinton polls (and other current polls Jan 2016)
Strong believer in the Constitution I see.
Amazing how so many people express the idea that they do not think the ballot box is a legitimate way to express their political will. It is amazing that violence has so many advocates.
I was kidding about the armed revolution, but I was serious about polling. And please note that I was referring to popularity polls, not balloting. Polling is manipulative. Imagine how different voting would be without it creating self-fulfilling prophecies. Polling clearly influences people like some crazy herd instinct. What other people think about a candidate is irrelevant to what you think about them and their proposals. There's no way Trump would be where he is had no polls been conducted.
Edited by Hyroglyphx, : No reason given.

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 451 by Theodoric, posted 01-03-2016 11:50 AM Theodoric has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 459 of 1639 (776217)
01-10-2016 6:26 AM
Reply to: Message 452 by LamarkNewAge
01-03-2016 1:40 PM


Hillary verses Trump does seem like a scary set of alternatives.
Yeah, it's like choosing between Syphilis and Gonorrhea.
Hillary has been in Washington for 24 years now, under 3 different 8 year administrations, and you know how many wars she opposed? From 1993-2001? Answer is 0. From 2001-2009? The answer is 0. 2009-2017? She wanted to do a lot more than an already war-active Obama (think Libya) would entertain. She opposed 0.
She's incredibly hawkish. She only bloviated about Iraq to get in step with her party, but she voted in favor of it. She tried to use double-speak to get out from under it, but no one is buying it.

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 452 by LamarkNewAge, posted 01-03-2016 1:40 PM LamarkNewAge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1578 by LamarkNewAge, posted 07-16-2016 5:29 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


(2)
Message 515 of 1639 (776840)
01-21-2016 3:10 AM
Reply to: Message 512 by Tanypteryx
01-20-2016 6:56 PM


Re: Palin Blames Obama
This could make the Loony of the Week, also.
Sarah Palin Blames Obama For Her Son’s Domestic Abuse Arrest
Wow, what a piece of shit. She tries deflect how dysfunctional her own family is (while preaching good 'ole fashioned family values from the pulpit) by throwing Obama under the bus. Cheap, lowly political ploy.

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 512 by Tanypteryx, posted 01-20-2016 6:56 PM Tanypteryx has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 517 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-21-2016 8:38 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 540 of 1639 (777317)
01-29-2016 1:40 AM
Reply to: Message 534 by Pressie
01-28-2016 8:01 AM


Re: My prediction. Sanders gets 54-56% in Iowa.
Lamark, I don't think that Hillary gets what likeability means. She's a very nice person and she can be funny and also serious and the works; but it seems as if for most people she still is not a very likeable person. She should have given it up after her attempt in 2008.
She's about as likeable as a rabid honey badger. Yes, she should have given up, but if you know anything about her, her whole life is about this moment. Her "marriage" to Bill was a political alliance, not a genuine marriage. It's an understanding they both have and serves as an expedient to getting what they want.
She's probably got the best policies in the world and she is extremely intelligent, and whatever, but she won't be elected.
I think she has terrible, heavy-handed policies. She's barely reminiscent of a Democrat because she's so hawkish.
The bottom line is that she comes across as shrewd, manipulative, and a liar who would stab you in the back if it benefitted her in some way.

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 534 by Pressie, posted 01-28-2016 8:01 AM Pressie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 544 by Pressie, posted 01-29-2016 6:27 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 543 of 1639 (777324)
01-29-2016 4:03 AM
Reply to: Message 541 by Dr Adequate
01-29-2016 1:55 AM


Re: Things Ben Carson Doesn't Know
This man is licensed to open your skull and try to improve your brain. Would you let him?
Perhaps he was performing self-surgery and his fell out

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 541 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-29-2016 1:55 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 546 of 1639 (777327)
01-29-2016 6:45 AM
Reply to: Message 544 by Pressie
01-29-2016 6:27 AM


Re: My prediction. Sanders gets 54-56% in Iowa.
She just doesn't have that non-academic X-factor.
I agree, and when she tries it seems very forced and unnatural for her

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 544 by Pressie, posted 01-29-2016 6:27 AM Pressie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 549 by Pressie, posted 01-29-2016 7:20 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 561 by Parasomnium, posted 02-03-2016 3:43 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 568 of 1639 (777583)
02-04-2016 1:19 AM
Reply to: Message 558 by Diomedes
02-03-2016 3:18 PM


Re: They are dropping like flies
Interestingly, Rand Paul got more votes than Bush yet he still dropped out.
I guess he still thinks the Bush dynasty is still relevant. It isn't.
I wonder how long before the 'establishment' Republicans start shifting their money towards Rubio, as he looks to be the best choice out of the remaining pack that has a chance and isn't completely bonkers.
Rand Paul and Marco Rubio seemed like the only one's that, as you said, aren't completely bonkers (not that I'm a fan of either). But as good of a debater and clear talent he has for politics, I can't get behind a lot of his policies.
I would like to see Rubio/Sanders, because at least these are the lesser of evils for me. Really don't know who I'd vote for at this point, because I identify as socially liberal (Sanders), but fiscally conservative (Rubio).
I'm truly the swing vote independent at this point.
Of course, there is the possibility that a decent libertarian might still throw their hat in to the ring, in which case, I will "throw my vote away" in their direction.

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 558 by Diomedes, posted 02-03-2016 3:18 PM Diomedes has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 590 of 1639 (777915)
02-12-2016 2:46 AM
Reply to: Message 581 by RAZD
02-11-2016 9:12 AM


Re: then superdelegates came and started rigging the system
The questions are thinly veiled attacks on Bernie Sanders rather than an unbiased opinion poll that it pretends to be.
This from the candidate that complained of "artful" smear campaigns.
National polls now put Bernie and Hillary neck and neck -- she is running scared.
Among liberals and progressives, I don't see much support for her. Almost every media outlet that leans to the left seems to be far more in support of Sanders than Clinton. There's only one or two publications that seem to openly support her, so who are the rest of these people?
Hawkish democrats? Overt feminists? Who else would support her over Bernie? I have no doubt that most Republicans would actually prefer her over Bernie, but they aren't supporting her because they are running their own primaries.
So who is left?
Either her fan base is not being accurately reflected in the media/polls or someone is manipulating the numbers to create the appearance of doing well, thus creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Edited by Hyroglyphx, : No reason given.

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 581 by RAZD, posted 02-11-2016 9:12 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 743 by RAZD, posted 02-19-2016 1:00 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 631 of 1639 (778173)
02-17-2016 7:26 PM
Reply to: Message 597 by coffee_addict
02-17-2016 1:33 PM


The problem with the polls at the moment is only the far right or the far left are participating. Most people don't vote until the general.
The problem with polls is that they manipulate how people behave based on perceived support. I'd wager that if all polling was blind, Trump would be about where he was during the 2012 campaign... damn near dead last. He's only bolstered by the polls increasing so that more and more people go in his direction.
The media and polls manufacture these results; which is the unintended (or perhaps intended) consequence of it. I wish nobody would pay attention to polls because they are irrelevant to who you think which candidate would best serve as president.
And to prove my point, a poll conducted on this very topic indicated that 67% of people agreed with me

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 597 by coffee_addict, posted 02-17-2016 1:33 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 632 of 1639 (778174)
02-17-2016 7:39 PM
Reply to: Message 599 by coffee_addict
02-17-2016 1:42 PM


It is abundantly clear nowadays that Obama was always for gay marriage. He just couldn't say it out loud for a long time because not too long ago people like me were still viewed as pedophiles. You should have seen my next door neighbor sent her 3rd grader son scurrying home and forbid him to come near us after I introduced her to my boyfriend. As much as I'd like Obama to have supported our rights since the beginning, I understand why he had to be in the closet about it.
While I also understand why he felt as though he has to hide his support, I still have no respect for any candidate who conceals such things just to remain popular. Who gives a shit? No matter what you do, somebody is going to take exception to it, so you might as well stand up for your actual beliefs.
Ron Paul never sold out on his principles, and although I disagree with a great many issues with Bernie, at least he comes across as honest and principled; something that has been desperately lacking in the White House for decades. That goes a long way with me. Hillary is a walking, talking lie. You can't trust her on ANY topic. It's politicking, pandering bullshit. She can't even say "hello" on television without it first having been scripted down to the punctuation.
Hell, a lot of people like Trump because he has no political correctness filter which pretty much is the polar opposite of conventional wisdom when it comes to politics. I think he's reprehensible, but at least you're getting an honest answer versus Ted Cruz who would tell you anything just to get your vote.
I don't know. I don't like sellouts or liars. If that's your thing, then Hillary is definitely your gal.

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 599 by coffee_addict, posted 02-17-2016 1:42 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 662 by caffeine, posted 02-18-2016 12:50 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


(4)
Message 633 of 1639 (778175)
02-17-2016 7:44 PM
Reply to: Message 602 by coffee_addict
02-17-2016 2:40 PM


Speaking as an atheist gay person, I will never support an atheist gay candidate in the primaries. Why? Because the current American public at large are still too bigoted to elect an atheist gay candidate in the general election.
Then how do you ever expect anything to change by keeping up appearances with the status quo?

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 602 by coffee_addict, posted 02-17-2016 2:40 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 634 by coffee_addict, posted 02-17-2016 7:54 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 636 of 1639 (778178)
02-17-2016 7:55 PM
Reply to: Message 613 by coffee_addict
02-17-2016 4:00 PM


Re: request for verification of fact
Trump has received overwhelming support from various white supremacist groups around the country. This is a fact unless you've been living under a rock.
True, but I seem to recall quite a few black supremacists voting for Obama and even resorting to voter intimidation. All things being equal, I hope your condemnation and scorn for such things was the same as it is with white supremacists voting for Trump.
While Cruz has not outright said death to gays, he has welcomed Kevin Swanson's support with open arms.
A lot of people aren't buying my theory on Ted Cruz, but I think he is gay as fuck... obviously, if so, a self-loathing homosexual. And Hillary, well, c'mon...

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 613 by coffee_addict, posted 02-17-2016 4:00 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 638 by coffee_addict, posted 02-17-2016 8:09 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 637 of 1639 (778179)
02-17-2016 8:02 PM
Reply to: Message 626 by Faith
02-17-2016 5:54 PM


Re: request for verification of fact
Nothing Trump has said that I've heard is racist. His objections to illegal immigration are not racist, his objections to admitting refugees without investigating them are not racist.
Claiming that Mexicans are rapists, with the provision that he assumes some are good people, or banning all Muslims in to a country is pretty close to overt racism, Faith.
It's really pointless to try and defend someone so transparent.

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 626 by Faith, posted 02-17-2016 5:54 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 639 by Faith, posted 02-17-2016 8:17 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024