Evidence that the Great Unconformity did not Form Before the Strata above it

The sides of what you're referring to as the Great Unconformity were already butted up against the Vishnu basement rock so the strata were just laid down on top of all that stuff.As shown in this pic: That far left side of the "Great Unconformity" butts up against the Vishnu, so the strata could not have butted up against the G.U. because there was already something there.

The layers are falling on top of the Vishnu, which is butted up against the GU, and they are also falling on the GU. And they're piling up on the one before them. They're is no obstacle to climb up over. The Vishnu goes all the way out to the left.The bump is there because the land is getting squished. The next techtonic plate to the west is pushing inward towards the one this is on.It'd kinda be like if you took a piece of paper laying on your desk, and held the right edge down against the desk with your right hand. Then, placing your left hand on the left edge of the paper, and moving it inwards towards the right.The paper will buckel upwards and make a bump.Now, both this image and that paper will be horribly exagerated in the upwards direction. Take a look at the spacestation image: How far out do you think the GU goes?How thick do you think it is?

The slope of the bump is really small. The height of the bump in the images is distorted.The strata can maintain levelness and conform to the shape of the bump if the slope is really shallow.Like, if the piece of paper you made a bump with only came up from the desk by a fraction of a millimeter, then you could have layers form on that without sliding down or bumping up against it or having to jump up over an obstacle. You could sprinkle sand on a piece of paper and have it conform to the bump if you keep the bump short enough.Also, have you considered that some of the layers could be forming while the bump is being uplifted? When the bump isn't too high, they can still conform to it.

Think about how short a bump would have to be in order for a layer to deposit on it and conform to its shape.It'd have to be pretty short. Can you honestly not imagine a little short bump that a layer could, actually, conform to?Not at all? Like I said, if the paper only came up a fraction of a millimeter, couldn't sand sprinkle onto that and conform to the shape?

That depends on what your goal is.First off, nothing precludes you from posting. Your posts can only be addressed after they are submitted.As to whether or not you should, well that is up to you.As to how you'll be responded to for what you post, well that is up to us.Moderation depends on the rules we all agreed to."It really is that simple".So if you don't want to be treated like an X then don't act like an X.

Which part were you incapable of understanding?

Maybe people shouldn't be using language like that to determine things like the age of the Earth...

In fact, He wouldn't have even had to stop anything at all.

If only you could extend this to everything the Bible says.As a purely descriptive view, from our point of view, it would look like the whole planet was flooded, but actually, it was not.As a purely descriptive view, from our point of view, it would look like the animals were created in their full form, but actually, they were not.I know, I know, you just gotta have that Fall for everything else to work.

Well there's your problem; you don't even know your enemy.

How are you going to provide evidence against something if you can't even think it its terms?

The surface in the picture in the post that you replied to is as level and straight as those of the G.U. in the pictures you posted.Why are you saying that that they are different? Is it because the slope, i.e. the increase in height over the increase in width, is different in the images?Is it possible that you are comparing different scales of height/distance, and that is causing you to misapprehend how "level" these surfaces are?

I honestly don't know. So out of curiosity, from this spacestation image: Where do you put the end of what you have called the GU? Can you download that image and put a mark on it where the end is? (I realize that's a lot of work to ask of you, but I think it'll help clear up the communication)

Okay, I've done that.Now what should I be looking at?

How could scientists have come to that conclusion without any evidence?