Evidence that the Great Unconformity did not Form Before the Strata above it

And this behavior has no explanation at all and on top of that, somehow, magically, if we take the current rates of movement and the measurements of the ages of the rocks formed during that movement we come up with just the distances traveled. Which has the marvelously simple explanation of them moving at that measured current rate for the time measured.Yet, another astonishing coincidence that you can't explain.

... is where you want to sweep the coincidence which was the point of my post which you ignored.

But, as has been pointed out to you, this is not just an assumption. If you take the current rate and apply it to dated objects in geology it all works out just right. You ignored that so you can pretend that it is "just" and assumption.So you have to explain why the dating and the speed are both wrong is just the right way that it all works.

Since you've had more explanation of this now and had time to learn more perhaps you can elaborate on what you mean by it being a coincidence.It is a "coincidence" that occurs all over the world. Are you suggesting that it all occurs by just chance? Or are you suggesting something else?

I'm still curious about what you meant.

I'm still curious as to what you mean by coincidence here.CatSci thinks that you believe that there isn't any match just that subjective looking at it makes some geologists think that there is one. Is that it?How can measurements made of age of rocks (independently of anything else to do with sea floor motions) be "subjectively" made to match with the positions of formations (like the Hawaiian islands) and the currently measured speed of the ocean floor?Is the speed of the floor measurement wrong?
Are the locations of the Hawaiian islands wrong?
Did someone change the dates to make the match happen?If any of these happened why haven't the "scientists" of the CRI exposed these errors by measuring correctly?Since it seems crazy to think that any of those things could be wrong and come up with the match I have to assume you mean something else other than what cat sci says. You don't like others saying what you mean so perhaps you can explain in more detail.

As well as I can guess what Faith is imagining is that the whole layer of sand has to be dropped at once. So for the pieces from a lower layer to be part way up in it they have to be suspended there while the sand layer builds up around them. I guess this is part of problem that is raised when you don't think any time can pass while the sediment builds up gradually.If you want to help Faith with this you are going to have to describe, in excruciating detail, how the archean gravel is eroded off a little at a time. Some rolls down onto sand already depostited and sits there while more tapetes is piled on top, them more gravel erodes down and so on. I am not willing to take the time to make if clear enough for her. I'll enjoy watching you try.