Presbyterian Church approves of same-sex marriages

Are you trying to denigrate a male-male marriage by saying that it means that the male is limiting his love to one male, and therefore no longer loving Jesus?Why doesn't that happen when a woman marries a man?Why can't the man love his husband and also love Jesus?

These gay men are raising families: Let me get this straight.A man and a woman can get married, as they are going to raise a family, so they can still love god first.But two men can somehow not raise a family, which means that need to focus exclusively on each other, and therefore they cannot love god first?Is that what you are trying to say?

I can't make the connection between gay marriage and focusing on each other to the exclusion of others.How'd you do it?

Its right there, Phat. Its all that spiritual union stuff you're talking about.Your whole argument looks like Begging the Question to me.That is, the thing you are concluding (that two men shouldn't get married) is one of the premises that you are starting with.

By that logic, women shouldn't marry men either.

If two men who are in a relationship do not finds themself idolizing the other and/or worshiping them, then should they be married?

What the churches could be doing is encouraging the two men to have a matrimony that is holy, in the same way that they do for a man and women. You know, giving yourself totally to the other person while keeping your union loving and promoting of good values.Staying hung up on whether or not they should "allow" it, while the men are going out and getting married, misses out on a great opportunity to keep God in the picture.They're going to have to stop being so dogmatic about hating men lying together if they don't want to be left in the dust.

Don't let them kid you, they've been evolving for centuries. And never without this same old restraint.

Its wrong to think that gay people can't have children. They do: Message 10

Have fun being left in the dust!

Don't let the door hit you on the way out!

Every single one of them?

Between them? Have you just failed to consider homosexuals having children with members of the opposite sex?They could get married before or after that event and still end up with a child they don't want. Especially if the other parent dies.

I'm not sure. It was a one-liner that read like a joke.It implied that gays can't have children, which is why I made the point that I did.What did you think they meant that made you side with gays not being able to have unwanted children?

There are tons of people who have had children before they got into same-sex relationships.