Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9072 total)
70 online now:
candle2, PaulK, Tangle (3 members, 67 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Post Volume: Total: 893,122 Year: 4,234/6,534 Month: 448/900 Week: 154/150 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Discontinuing research about ID
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 85 of 393 (755286)
04-07-2015 5:46 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by Tanypteryx
04-05-2015 3:00 PM


Re: Um...
Faith has created her own world in the Q Continuum.

The Q must have stripped her of her powers to teach her a lesson of some kind.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-05-2015 3:00 PM Tanypteryx has seen this message

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 159 of 393 (756058)
04-15-2015 5:44 AM
Reply to: Message 158 by marc9000
04-14-2015 10:04 PM


Re: Moderator On Duty
I sense a lot of atheists coming unglued over something they can't handle. Dubreuil actually comes across as amazingly patient with the arrogance directed at him. I suspect you'll delete this whole thread, not just my post.

You appear to be defining arrogance as not agreeing. It does not appear that anyone agrees that that Star Trek is proof of a triune god, rather than arrogance.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by marc9000, posted 04-14-2015 10:04 PM marc9000 has taken no action

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 170 of 393 (756258)
04-17-2015 6:18 AM
Reply to: Message 169 by Dr Adequate
04-17-2015 1:55 AM


And if you group the red peppers and the green squares in the same group as the dark squares with the white dot in the middle you actually have two crosses.

Twice the signal strength.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-17-2015 1:55 AM Dr Adequate has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022