I sense a lot of atheists coming unglued over something they can't handle. Dubreuil actually comes across as amazingly patient with the arrogance directed at him. I suspect you'll delete this whole thread, not just my post.
You appear to be defining arrogance as not agreeing. It does not appear that anyone agrees that that Star Trek is proof of a triune god, rather than arrogance.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
™ Version 4.2
(1)
