Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,758 Year: 4,015/9,624 Month: 886/974 Week: 213/286 Day: 20/109 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did Religion Give Birth to Morals?
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3483 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 10 of 68 (383152)
02-07-2007 6:59 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Open MInd
02-06-2007 10:52 PM


quote:
Is it possible for a moral to exist outside of religion?
The word moral is the name given to accepted standards of behavior. It isn't a thing. As DJ pointed out in Message 3 for a group to succeed they need to get along, to get along they need basic rules of conduct.
quote:
No animals are moral.
IMO, nonhuman animals do have accepted standards of behavior. They aren't neccessarily the same as human standards, but then while humans may share some basic ideas of right behavior; all human standards of right behavior are not necessarily the same in every culture.
quote:
They find nothing wrong with killing for food.
And neither do most people if you are talking about killing an animal for nourishment.
quote:
Unless one argues that science is a religion, it seems obvious that the birth of morals is the religions of the world and that religion controls every individual human beings life.
Why do people keep trying to say that science is a religion. Maybe religion is just an ancient form of science that stopped updating.
IMO, standards of behavior have been around even before humans.

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Open MInd, posted 02-06-2007 10:52 PM Open MInd has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024