The strongest proof I have of creation and design is that that are no viable alternatives. There is absolutely no other way that the universe; the stars; the galaxies; the planets; and, life could have come about. Physical matter doesn't just materialize from nothing. It doesn't work that way. And, life never comes from non-life. With all of our technology we cannot create life. Why would we expect blind chance to do what we can't do?
Before evolutionists even begin to discuss evolution of life, they must fully and completely explain the following:
***Cosmic Evolution: "Time, space, and matter" must have come into existence in the same instance, at precisely the same time. For instance: if there were time and matter without space WHERE would we put it? Or, if we had matter and space without time WHEN would we put it?
Evolutionists who talk about the "Big bang" must explain How (without information, direction, and/or intent) all this took place.
***Stellar & Planetary Evolution: Evolutionist must explain how all the vast galaxies; solar systems; suns; planets; and moons came into existence from nothing. Where did the laws that govern these bodies come from?
***Chemical Evolution: This requires that all elements on the periodic table must have evolved from hydrogen. Hydrogen cannot produce all know elements.
Much like when evolutionists rely on circular reasoning for dating fossils and rocks (they date the fossils by the rocks they were found in, and they date the rocks by the fossils that were found in them), they rely on circular reasoning with "chemical evolution." Their theory is that the stars made the elements and also that the elements made the stars.
***Organic Evolution: This states that all life appeared from nothing. Evolutionists assert that nonliving matter wrote its own information, whether they admit this or not. Scientists cannot create even the most simple life; yet, they have at their disposal abundantly more than nonliving matter.
***Macro Evolution: Is change from one "kind" of animal into another and different "kind" of animal.
The Biblical explanation defines a "kind" as being able to bring forth--its own kind. A "kind" can never (and has never been shown to do so) bring forth an organism that is not of its "kind."
Dogs, coyotes, wolves, and foxes have been known to successfully interbreed, but they are the same "kind" of animal. The Bible separates animals into "kinds" not species.
Operational science verifies that the Bible is correct. We observe "kind" coming from "kind." We have never observed a "kind" bringing forth a totally different "kind" of animal from itself.
***Micro Evolution: is not really evolution at all; a better term would be "adaptation" within the parameters of the "kind." No new information is added to the gene pool. Most adaptations occur because of climate changes.
Never, never, never does "micro evolution" involve new information to the gene pool. It simply selects from the information already in the DNA. No new information is created and without adding new information it is not evolution.
™ Version 4.2
