Existence of Noah's Ark

According to you, he only needed one amino acid to start the entire list of species over again, lmao.

It was a joke.

On a more serious note, I once saw a Christian TV show that claimed that the ark would indeed hold all the species of the earth, and that there was room enough left over for the dinosaurs.I was wondering if this was actually correct or not. We know the size of the ark, can we figure out how much space the 18,000,000 species would actually need?
Lets assume they will all live in harmony, since God sent them there.Lets not include the freshwater species since how the flood happened, if it did, has not been determend by science yet. I feel as though if it rained hard enough to flood the earth, provided there was enough water, that the water over land would still be fresh water, and higher than sea level, because it would be draining back to the sea. So all water dwelling creatures would be able to survive a flood.

18 million wasn't my number.Hres a thought though. If it is 8 billion, divide that into the amount of years scientists think earth was around 4.6 bilion, and you get almost 2 new species every year appearing. Do we see that?

I knew that, but didn't go there.So if so many of these are happening, are we witnessing it?

No rhain, if what I am saying has any truth to it, I mean I really don't know, its just a thought based on what I see around where I live.I live on a very steep mountain of about 500ft. If we get a rain storm here of just 4" in one day, then the entire hill floods. The water not only pours down the streams, it starts coming out of the ground everywhere.
If you could picture the mountain as being a giant sponge. Once the sponge cannot hold anymore water it starts coming out from everywhere. I'm sure that the hydrostatic pressure under the ground must be intense, with 500ft of alttitude behind it. I have seen the water actually spray out of the cracks in my driveway. My driveway has a slope of about 30 degrees.
So this is only after only one day and 4" of rain.
What if something here in earths history caused the oceans to produce so much rain over the land, that the run-off couldn't keep up with the rain.
You say that it would immediatly drain off. But if you measured it, I think it takes about a day for the water to get from where I live to the sea, which is about40-50 miles from here. So you can see the potential for the water backing up. Just how much rain would be required for this to happen to biblical proportions, I do not know.
I wish I could make a computer model of what I am saying to cleary show you guys.

Well one place we could look is at deseases in humans, and the rate at which they pop-up.I wonder why its only the simple life forms that pop up so rapidly. Besides of the obvious answer of complexity.

Again, I will explain to you.The way I am saying it, you wonldn't need as much water as you are claiming it would take to flood the earth, as all the water would not be at the same level, due to run-off. Just like water at the top of the stream is not at the same level as the place it filters into.

Wow, again you have just turned around everything I said, and you don't get it.
Tell your precious mountain wouldn't flood after 3 feet of rai, rhain.And since the earth surface is 73% water, the ocean could drop in proportion, and not expose that much land that wouldn't be covered by run-off. Why don't you ask the people liveing in flood plains.
Why does my mountain flood, and the incline is 30 degrees?
Why is there every any floods at all? Because water backs up, duh. It can only run-off so fast.
Again ask the people living along the mississippi if water backs up, even though it can run-off.Or stay in my basement during a flood time on my mountain, and see if your feet don't get wet.You just don't get it.There are engineers that specialize in what I'm saying. It is a major concern for every slope, hill, plain. I guess we don't need these people, because water always runs off right rhain? No it doesn't. Thats what I'm saying. Your to stuck in what you think is right, as if you had all the answers. You need to wake up and realize that there could be another way of something happening, one that you couldn't think of.
How could you possibly pretend to know exactly the only way the earth can flood? Thats closed mindedness, which is un-scientific. No I am NOT, I am trying to calculate run-off. No, I want to think globally. I'm not saying I know what could have caused this condition, but if it did happen, how would it look?It could rain over land, and not rain over the oceans. How, I don't know, thats a separate part of the theory, or thought. If the oceans were hotter than all the land, this could happen right?

Why do you duplicate your answers?I can't believe your logic sometimes.

OMG, you guys are just not reading what I wrote.
Why do I have to explain it again?

Rhains logic is very flawed. I have proved this time and again. I will continue to do so.There is no need for duplicate answers to the same problem, it does not make him twice as right, thats poor logic.

Then I am not interested in what you have to say, you are a waste of my time.

Who cares.

Be prepared, I am going to start a new thread proving that your logic is flawed.I would love to converse with you on this subject, but you always seem dead set on proving me wrong no matter what I say, or explain.You try to accomplish this by taking things out of context one by one, and say if this is wrong, then all he has to say must be wrong, and then write off every thought I ever had has being foolish, or driven by religion.I find this extremely illogical.
You don't understand what I am trying to explain, because you are so deaad set on believing the flood never happened, or you just didn't really read what I wrote.