Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,487 Year: 3,744/9,624 Month: 615/974 Week: 228/276 Day: 4/64 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Existence of Noah's Ark
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 29 of 256 (142523)
09-15-2004 11:46 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by joshua221
09-13-2004 9:58 PM


Here's a question for you
If:
quote:
All of the analyses performed on the "Rivet" found it to contain Iron, Aluminum, Manganese, Vanadium and Chromium. These elements are known today to be the major alloying agents added to titanium.
Why does the analysis reported not mention Vanadium AT ALL and report "<0.1%" Chromium (which may well mean "too little to measure").
Why is there so much more Iron and Aluminium than Titanium ? (>8% Fe and Al <2% Ti).
Come to that, why does the supposed "petrified wood" seem to contain more Titanium (~1.9%) than the supposed remains of a Titanium-alloy washer (~1.6%) ?
And why isn't there less Fe, Al, Mn OR Cr in the "petrified wood" ?
Surely the remains of a metal washer should contain more of the metal (even in oxide form) than the surrounding wood.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by joshua221, posted 09-13-2004 9:58 PM joshua221 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by jar, posted 09-15-2004 7:33 PM PaulK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024