Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,461 Year: 3,718/9,624 Month: 589/974 Week: 202/276 Day: 42/34 Hour: 5/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Existence of Noah's Ark
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 114 of 256 (145828)
09-29-2004 10:05 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Rrhain
09-25-2004 12:37 AM


The only way to flood a planet that has significant dry land is to add water from outside the planet.
If the planet's surface were relatively level, having a relatively even crust overall, it would not take nearly as much water to flood the entire earth as it would today with high mountain ranges. Many, including myself believe that was what the pre-flood earth's surface was like, with no deep and large oceans or high mountain ranges. There were also likely thick and thin areas of earth's crust. Some thin areas may have had subterranian water under them, as the Bible implicates the breaking up of the subterranian water cavities by the flood. The Bible also implicates a terrarium like vapor canopy in the atmosphere which likely fell to earth during the flood. The weight of all the water on the relatively level earth crust would sink the thin crust areas and push up the mountain ranges, causing the earth's crust to look much different after the flood than what it appeared to be before the flood began.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Rrhain, posted 09-25-2004 12:37 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by Rrhain, posted 09-30-2004 8:49 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 152 by portmaster1000, posted 09-30-2004 9:34 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 141 of 256 (145968)
09-30-2004 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 135 by Rrhain
09-30-2004 8:49 AM


[qs]But it isn't. Mt. Everest is five miles tall, has been that tall for quite some time, and will remain that tall long after we are gone assuming nothing blows it up.[/i]
But none of us was there so nobody knows exactly how long it's been that tall.
If the planet's surface were relatively level, the earth would be flooded twice a day as the tides covered it over. Since that doesn't happen, then it is apparent to all but the most casual observer that it is topologically impossible to cover the earth with water.
Note my hypothesis that there was much more water in the atmosphere then to create the vapor canopy and there were much smaller shallower oceans on earth. Overall then we could have had a lot more subterranian water as well as more atmospheric water with no direct sunlight. I know you're gona come up with the atmospheric pressure and all, but imo, the atmosphere was likely much higher with less density per sq in then. The canopy protection from the cold outer space would make up for the dimmer sun with no direct sunlight rays as we have today. Like in the winter in the North. It's those cold clear sunny days that are coldest. The cloud cover brings the warmer days.
To do that, you need to add water above sea level. But all the water we have is at sea level or below. Any water we take from the oceans will immediately flow back to the oceans. You can certain dump the water on the land, but you can't keep it there.
Gotta run outa town today so that's all I can say now.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by Rrhain, posted 09-30-2004 8:49 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by jar, posted 09-30-2004 11:02 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 145 by nator, posted 09-30-2004 5:04 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 161 by Rrhain, posted 10-01-2004 3:59 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 162 by Rrhain, posted 10-01-2004 4:07 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 170 of 256 (146459)
10-01-2004 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 162 by Rrhain
10-01-2004 4:07 AM


Which has more pressure: A column of air weighing one metric ton in a column one square meter in cross section and one kilometer tall or a column of air weighing one metric ton in a column one square meter in cross section and ten kilometers tall?
Imo, your model is not relative to my hypothesis. My hypothesis has a greater quantity of water in a greater volumn of atmosphere than is observed on earth today. If your atmospheric ceiling were at, say, 70,000 feet, as compared to 35,000 feet, the greater atmosphere could contain more water and maintain a livable atmospheric pressure on earth's surface. In order for this to happen, likely there would need be an adjustment in gravity or something physiological, but hey, that must have been the case if the Biblical account is true, for indeed, something had to have happened providentially to cause the flood to happen and the vapor canopy to condense into rain. The Biblical record definitely has a far different earth and atmosphere, pre-flood than is observed today.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 162 by Rrhain, posted 10-01-2004 4:07 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by Rei, posted 10-01-2004 3:03 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 173 by Loudmouth, posted 10-01-2004 6:50 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 177 by Rrhain, posted 10-02-2004 7:33 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024