|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: New Species of Homo Discovered: Homo naledi | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DrJones* Member Posts: 2340 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 7.8 |
Ah, and assembled them into one. Pretty risky method there. Again READ the articles. They recovered over 1500 specimens and assembled 15 individuals from them.It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds soon I discovered that this rock thing was true Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world And so there was only one thing I could do Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On *not an actual doctor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DevilsAdvocate Member (Idle past 3356 days) Posts: 1548 Joined: |
Really Faith? Are you really that ignorant to think scientists (some of who are liscenced medical doctors/researchers) do not understand this. These skelatal remains are typically outside the range of human variability. In addition, the physiological structure of the bones in no way matches any type of modern human, giant or dwarf. And yes, if you actually read the research findings in scientific jounals instead of the sensationalism of newspapers and magazines you will read the exact physical dimensions and other details of these skeletal remains.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2360 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
Whole arrays of skulls are often presented as if to prove differences between some ancient type of human and today's, but they all just look like normal variations on skulls you see walking down the street every day To you, perhaps. To someone who has some training in osteology--no. Don't you think we really study these things, and really know something about what we're doing? Are you so clueless that you really think we're making this all up? Just read some scientific journals, such as American Journal of Physical Anthropology and look at the level of detail in the analyses. And perhaps learn something before you shoot off your mouth. In science credibility is very important--those who are repeatedly wrong are scorned. Apparently that's not the case with apologetics...Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge. Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers If I am entitled to something, someone else is obliged to pay--Jerry Pournelle If a religion's teachings are true, then it should have nothing to fear from science...--dwise1 "Multiculturalism" demands that the US be tolerant of everything except its own past, culture, traditions, and identity.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1699 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Long as you're all in thrall to evolution I don't trust one thing any of you say about fossil finds.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DevilsAdvocate Member (Idle past 3356 days) Posts: 1548 Joined: |
No they don't Faith.
Here is homo sapiens compared to neanderthal (humans closest cousins).
Vastly different, no modern human skull looks like this. Ask any medical researcher, forensic scientist or paleontologist.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DevilsAdvocate Member (Idle past 3356 days) Posts: 1548 Joined: |
So you rather we trust someone like you who is totally ignorant in this subject.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1699 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Picture is not very clear. But a very different type of human proves nothing about evolution, just that such variations are possible from the human genome, perhaps under unusual conditions of genetic isolation.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1699 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
No, you don't have to trust me, but you might consider that you could be deceived by a false theory because your evidence isn't very convincing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DevilsAdvocate Member (Idle past 3356 days) Posts: 1548 Joined: |
None of the skulls on the left look anything like modern human skulls.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DevilsAdvocate Member (Idle past 3356 days) Posts: 1548 Joined: |
Convincing to who?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1699 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Couldn't find a single modern skull of those types?
So they either aren't human or they are normal variations on human that no longer exist. Before the Flood there would certainly have been all kinds of wildly different versions of every living thing including human beings.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Whole arrays of skulls are often presented as if to prove differences between some ancient type of human and today's, but they all just look like normal variations on skulls you see walking down the street every day. If the folks in your town resemble Homo naledi in having a cranial capacity less than 600 cc ... well, that would explain a lot.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DevilsAdvocate Member (Idle past 3356 days) Posts: 1548 Joined: |
I give up Faith. Just admit you have zero evidence for your claims and you are totally and deliberately ignorant in this area. You make zero effort to back up anything you say. This is why I left evc forum the last time. Because people like you make stupid unsubstantiated claims against the mountains of evidence that you snidely dismiss. I am done with your idiocy. Good night.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DevilsAdvocate Member (Idle past 3356 days) Posts: 1548 Joined: |
What is so funny is that you Hovind claim extreme variability aka evolution after the flood from pairs of each species in a timeline thousands of fold more rapid than what modern science shows. How utterly ridiculous and inane. Good night for the last time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1699 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
But modern science DOESN'T "show" that at all, it assumes it because the theory requires it. Variation in reality occurs quite rapidly when small numbers are isolated. After the Flood small populations would have been constantly splitting off from the larger groups and moving out geographically, which is the perfect condition for rapid phenotypic variation.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024