Tangle writes:
I just don't think it's necessary to add the qualifiers 'past experience'
Yeah, I was wondering that myself. I just jammed it in there 'cause it made it sound more formal
if you can't make decisions based on anything at all that will change a predetermined outcome then you don't have free choice.
I agree.
What would a test for this sort of thing look like?
That is, would we have to be able to identify a "predetermined outcome" and then see if anyone can get out of it?
For example:
A.
Red and blue button in a room.
Observers "predetermine" that the subject will press the red button.
Subject presses the red button.
Confirmation?
What about this:
B.
Red and blue button in a room.
Observers "predetermine" that the subject will press the red button.
Observers inform subject that subject will be pressing the red button.
Subject presses the blue button (if possible???)
If the subject always presses the red button in "B"... then I agree we have something.
But does "A" actually show that anything is "predetermined?" Or does it just show that we can make accurate predictions?