Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 59 (9025 total)
46 online now:
dwise1 (1 member, 45 visitors)
Newest Member: JustTheFacts
Post Volume: Total: 883,362 Year: 1,008/14,102 Month: 411/597 Week: 21/168 Day: 21/23 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is the future inevitable?
Larni
Member (Idle past 80 days)
Posts: 3998
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 16 of 109 (773805)
12-09-2015 12:21 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by YellowJay
12-08-2015 10:33 AM


In a deterministic universe yes. Otherwise no.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by YellowJay, posted 12-08-2015 10:33 AM YellowJay has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Dogmafood, posted 12-09-2015 5:38 PM Larni has responded

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 80 days)
Posts: 3998
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(2)
Message 18 of 109 (773840)
12-09-2015 7:51 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Dogmafood
12-09-2015 5:38 PM


I guess that before causality was invented lots of things just 'happened'.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Dogmafood, posted 12-09-2015 5:38 PM Dogmafood has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021