With a dying white race, why are we not encouraging more white births?

Ummm, I'd like to point out that Muslims are not a "race," let alone a "darker race," it's a religion and many of its practitioners are...... *wait for it*.... white.Now, it's no mystery that many hardline Muslim immigrants in Europe have openly stated that they don't necessarily need force to take over Europe; that in a few decades they'll simply breed themselves into power.There may be some truth to that in the sense that the European rate of fertility is extremely low. Japan is having a bit of a crisis because there are essentially missing generations. The ratio of elderly to young people is becoming extremely lopsided, which is straining an already dwindling working class.But I digress because those are Asians, or as you might like to call them, "yellow people." In any case, they aren't "white people," and because of that you could care less. The patronizingly liberal nature of many European nations for a long time refused to even acknowledge that there was a violent strain of Islam because to acknowledge it would be politically incorrect and racist. This was a huge mistake and they're paying for it now.But what often happens in that vacuum rises a strain of xenophobic, racism such as, well, YOU and Trump. The inaction of the far left tends to create the proliferation of extreme rightwing radicals. And in the end, people like you and Trump fall right into the hands of groups like ISIS by doing EXACTLY what they want you to do... which is alienate all Muslims so that more and more become radicalized.Looks like they've outsmarted you again.

I apologize for assuming you were racist towards Asians simply because you're racist towards "dark people." I guess both of us are full ASSUMPTIONS!

Whites do not have the most genetic variation, Sub-Saharan blacks have more, especially when considering that it's incontrovertible that all the races developed in sub-Saharan Africa. As for the development of democracy, it may or may not have been developed by "whites" as a matter of happenstance or deliberation. But what's your point exactly -- that all races need to bow in deference to white people for introducing democracy? That's a rather elitist position to take, especially since it sounds like you're taking credit for it on account that you happen to be white.Race is just about as nebulous as gender, and it is not something one can control, so I hardly understand why anyone can take pride in something that was not earned but rather was assigned to them in the womb.

Although I shouldn't respond to this because it's technically derailing the OP, you are painting with an awfully broad brush. To accept that all Muslims are the same is to likewise assume that all Christian denominations are the same. You know that isn't true, so why do you assume that all Muslims think or behave alike?

Aren't you being selective, if not hypocritical then given the horrific atrocities within the bible? There are passages where the LORD commands them to smash infants skulls on rocks. You could drone on and on about the differences between the old and New Testament, but God is the same forever and ever, is he not?Now, don't misunderstand me. Islam is one of the most destructive ideologies ever devised. No argument there. The issue is unilaterally banning people because of their associations with any given religion. It's the danger of becoming that which you hate. Torturing people who torture is kind of antithetical to hating it in the first place.

Where do think Islam spawned from, Faith? It's all a derivative of Judeo-Christian ethics and beliefs. I'm typing on my phone and it's difficult to copy and paste passages, but go through Deuteronomy or Judges.And how I was a Christian was because I, like you, think the ideals taught by Jesus was and is a beautiful ideal. I respect it. But his message is absolutely foreign from the horrors of the OT.

Faith, lol, that's pure conjecture that it comes from a demon. When you compare apples with apples, Islam is an Abrahamic faith just like Judaism and Christianity. Now, I'm not saying that it isn't a bastardization, but Jews make the argument that Christianity is a bastardization of Judaism. And on face value that is justifiable because regardless if Jesus said he didn't come to abolish the law, he in fact did change it.

We're wayyyyy off topic now, but what's your evidence that it comes from a demon named Gabriel?

So, in other words, the same arch angel discussed within Judeo-Christendom. You're making the point for me that the progenitor of Islam is Judaism.

I can assure you I was a Christian. Even Jesus acknowledges, via Parable of the Sower, that people fall away for various reasons. And in some of Paul's epistles he acknowledges the same. But my sincerity in the past shouldn't be in question just because I've changed my mind in the future. I was the real deal. It was genuine and sincere for me. Ironically it was the bible itself that forced me to question itself, and my deconversion was very slow.Anyway, agree to disagree, I guess. But whatever the case, my faith (or lack thereof), isn't really relevant to the discussion at hand.

No one here is defending Islam or Muhammed. Of course it is complete and utter garbage. What saner voices are trying to remind you is that Muslims are not necessarily de facto pieces of crap anymore than Christians are or Hindus. There is a real danger in polarizing people much in the same way that we've seen with Nazism, even if there is always some justification for the resentment.And let me remind you that this reaction of yours is exactly what hardline militants are going for. They want to create an Us vs Them atmosphere so that they can recruit moderate Muslims to full blown, rabid murderers.... And you're falling for the bait. If you hate Islam and Muslims, then you don't just have a million extremist enemies... You now have 2 billion enemies.

This doesn't mean that all or even most Muslims are secretly conspiring for world domination. Consider how many lukewarm Christians exist who barely understand even elementary aspects of their own religion. There are Muslims who fit that same profile, where their faith is almost an obligatory response for cultural reasons.

No more than the Jews towards all Goyim. Many Jews are explicitly told not to associate with the Goyim, whereas many, many other Jews don't take that to heart. Well, there is no question that the Islamic faith is a steaming pile of trash, and I do find it hilarious that many Progressives have no problem denouncing Christianity but do in fact whitewash Islam -- little angels who can do no wrong.However, even in spite of that, you are the opposite extreme of that extreme. You're like one step away from opening internment camps and waging your own jihad. These people evidently terrify you, which is the goal of the terroristic minority. I feel sorry that they've succeeded so thoroughly in their plan.

But what does it matter either way if race is so nebulous? Race is only extant because of thousands of years separation, where distinct features formed in the absence of genetic diversity (don't worry, that comports with microevolutionary beliefs, so there should be no contention).And what does it all mean? If blacks and Asians were procreating with one another, does every subsequent generation lose their black identity or their Asian identity as a result? Which race is necessarily absorbed by the other? If you are a biracial person from black and Asian ancestry, do you necessarily become grandfathered in as black or Asian? Or are you just a person?The same question applies with anything else. If a German Caucasian procreates with an Irish Caucasian, which heritage is that child sacrificing? Are they necessarily losing their Germanness or their Irishness as a result?If everybody is intermingling racial lines, why is it that only "white people" are losing their identity? That's what GIA fails to understand or explain.Hell, we could even simplify. If a German Shepherd mates with a Doberman, what kind of breed does the resulting puppy belong to?

I was addressing your comment that you thought he was right about the decline of the white population. And to be clear, those questions are mostly directed to him but he wasn't around to answer them.