Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 81 (9005 total)
55 online now:
AZPaul3, vimesey (2 members, 53 visitors)
Newest Member: kanthesh
Post Volume: Total: 881,161 Year: 12,909/23,288 Month: 634/1,527 Week: 73/240 Day: 1/35 Hour: 1/0

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When Peer Review Fails: Bad Science Papers of the Week
jar
Member
Posts: 32920
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 17 of 27 (779477)
03-04-2016 3:40 PM


Fortunately this is a case where peer review succeeded.
Peer review does not stop at publication, rather that is when peer review actually begins. In this case their may have been an error in allowing eraly publication but that error was caught and caught through peer review.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Pressie, posted 03-07-2016 5:59 AM jar has not yet responded

  
jar
Member
Posts: 32920
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 26 of 27 (779721)
03-07-2016 11:44 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Dr Adequate
03-07-2016 11:39 AM


Peer review continues
Fortunately in science, peer review is an ongoing activity and even past results continue to be critically tested.

It's a useful tool.


Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Dr Adequate, posted 03-07-2016 11:39 AM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020