Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (9005 total)
47 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, FLRW, JonF, PaulK, Stile (6 members, 41 visitors)
Newest Member: kanthesh
Post Volume: Total: 881,117 Year: 12,865/23,288 Month: 590/1,527 Week: 29/240 Day: 10/19 Hour: 3/2

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When Peer Review Fails: Bad Science Papers of the Week
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2380
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 3.6


(1)
Message 15 of 27 (779468)
03-04-2016 2:33 PM


Years ago I was asked to review an English translation of a Japanese book about dragonflies. The translator was an American living in Japan who had no knowledge of entomology or biology. There were some very odd sentences in English and in some cases a dozen or more back and forth discussions to understand what the author was saying. This was all complicated by the translator not using email and his handwriting was so small that I had to use a magnifying glass to read it.

The project took 2 years and I was supposed to get a copy of the $600 book. They claimed my copy was stolen in the mail so I never got one.


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy


  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020