Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (9005 total)
54 online now:
AnswersInGenitals, AZPaul3, dwise1, FLRW, JonF, PaulK, Stile (7 members, 47 visitors)
Newest Member: kanthesh
Post Volume: Total: 881,117 Year: 12,865/23,288 Month: 590/1,527 Week: 29/240 Day: 10/19 Hour: 3/2

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When Peer Review Fails: Bad Science Papers of the Week
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5312
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 27 of 27 (779765)
03-08-2016 6:36 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Dr Adequate
03-07-2016 11:39 AM


Re: Failure To Replicate
quote:
...the Open Science Collaboration (OSC) tried to reproduce the results of 100 published studies. More than half of them failed, creating sensational headlines worldwide about the “replication crisis” in psychology.
.
.
.
But an in-depth examination of the data ... has revealed that the OSC made some serious mistakes that make its pessimistic conclusion completely unwarranted.

Seems to me the OSC has just created another data point supporting their own conclusions.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Dr Adequate, posted 03-07-2016 11:39 AM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020