Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,850 Year: 4,107/9,624 Month: 978/974 Week: 305/286 Day: 26/40 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Yes, The Real The New Awesome Primary Thread
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 827 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 211 of 478 (781988)
04-13-2016 8:23 AM
Reply to: Message 209 by AZPaul3
04-13-2016 7:42 AM


Re: On Wisconsin
AZPaul3 writes:
In this instance, a third party run by The Donald is a highly likely scenario if he fails to bluster and intimidate his way into the Republican nomination.
Ahh yes this is the strategy of the holding position. Give them hope but not too much. Tell them what they want to hear. Tell them that they DO have democracy - just not today. Their chance will come tomorrow and as we all know; tomorrow never comes. By the time November has arrived - they will have thought up a new scam to ensure that the people never get what they want. Great strategy which has been working a treat I must say.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by AZPaul3, posted 04-13-2016 7:42 AM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by AZPaul3, posted 04-13-2016 8:48 PM Big_Al35 has replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 827 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 212 of 478 (781989)
04-13-2016 8:26 AM
Reply to: Message 210 by jar
04-13-2016 8:21 AM


Re: On Wisconsin
jar writes:
Ah, Al. Have you ever voted?
I live in the UK. We have a completely different system to yours. Perhaps you think that I shouldn't stick my nose into American affairs?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by jar, posted 04-13-2016 8:21 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by jar, posted 04-13-2016 8:33 AM Big_Al35 has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 213 of 478 (781990)
04-13-2016 8:33 AM
Reply to: Message 212 by Big_Al35
04-13-2016 8:26 AM


US voting practices
Not at all. Feel free but also learn.
In the US there are 7 states where you cannot run as a write in candidate and in 35 other states a write in candidate must file papers to be eligible. The US has 50 states and each state can determine local voting requirements as long as those requirements do not conflict with Federal rules. Things like voting hours and polling locations are determined at even lower levels, often at the city or county level.
As a UK Citizen this US election should be of truly great importance and will very possibly determine many facets of life in the UK in the future.
Edited by jar, : fix sub-title

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 8:26 AM Big_Al35 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 214 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 9:14 AM jar has replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 827 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 214 of 478 (781991)
04-13-2016 9:14 AM
Reply to: Message 213 by jar
04-13-2016 8:33 AM


Re: On Wisconsin
jar writes:
In the US there are 7 states where you cannot run as a write in candidate and in 35 other states a write in candidate must file papers to be eligible
Well this is the first American election that I have ever shown any interest in. And this is the first time that I have ever learnt about your voting system. I must confess I am utterly shocked and dumbfounded. In the UK, although I can't say for certain, our system is pretty much rigged. From what I have learnt - your system is too. I just consider your 2-party system to be like our 2-party system and I never consider other possibilities because the probability of another outcome is so remote. It seems odd that you have different laws in different states when it comes to voting for your president. It's like a recipe for manipulation, fraud and dishonesty.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by jar, posted 04-13-2016 8:33 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 215 by jar, posted 04-13-2016 9:34 AM Big_Al35 has replied
 Message 216 by DrJones*, posted 04-13-2016 10:37 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 222 by ringo, posted 04-13-2016 11:50 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 215 of 478 (781992)
04-13-2016 9:34 AM
Reply to: Message 214 by Big_Al35
04-13-2016 9:14 AM


Re: On Wisconsin
BA writes:
It seems odd that you have different laws in different states when it comes to voting for your president. It's like a recipe for manipulation, fraud and dishonesty.
It's a concept called democracy Al, where local folk get to decide locally how they want to proceed.
But wait, there's more.
In the US there is not a two party system. In fact there are quite a few US political parties, with the Republicans and the Democrats being the largest. There are five fairly large parties including a Libertarian, a Green and a Constitution party. There is even the Communist Party USA and has been since 1919 as well as about thirty other currently active parties.
There are also regional parties, often limited to just one state.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 9:14 AM Big_Al35 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 217 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 11:18 AM jar has replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2290
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 216 of 478 (781994)
04-13-2016 10:37 AM
Reply to: Message 214 by Big_Al35
04-13-2016 9:14 AM


Re: On Wisconsin
It seems odd that you have different laws in different states when it comes to voting for your president.
to be clear, nobody is voting for president yet, that will come in November. Right now the parties are holding their own competitions to pick who will be their presidential candidate in November. The primaries are analogous to a party leadership conference in a parliamentary system.

It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds
soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry
Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 9:14 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 827 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 217 of 478 (781996)
04-13-2016 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 215 by jar
04-13-2016 9:34 AM


Re: On Wisconsin
jar writes:
It's a concept called democracy Al, where local folk get to decide locally how they want to proceed.
So let me get this right; the local people of Colorado decided for themselves, that they are too dumb to vote. They thought that they should just hand their votes over to people with higher IQs (after all they are just cattle). The higher IQ delegates therefore make the decisions for their cattle, as you would expect with any good farmer. Remarkable system. And bravo to the citizens of Colorado who recognized their shortcomings.
You see I am fully aware of a rigged system when I see one - having been brought up in one all my life. I naturally understand all the nuances and deceptive tricks that they play. Ohh and this bears no resemblance to selecting a party leader like in the UK. Here, the Conservatives select the Labour party leader by quickly joining the party, choosing a leader, and then terminating their memberships.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by jar, posted 04-13-2016 9:34 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 219 by Bliyaal, posted 04-13-2016 11:39 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 220 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-13-2016 11:43 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 221 by jar, posted 04-13-2016 11:44 AM Big_Al35 has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4444
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 218 of 478 (781997)
04-13-2016 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 207 by AZPaul3
04-13-2016 12:02 AM


Re: Ryan Says No!
Cleveland, oh Cleveland, what potential you hold. The fights, the fists, the blood could be gold.
So poetic.
I would pay money to watch Mitch McConnel get punched in the nose hard enough to be knocked down. That video would go viral as a screen saver.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by AZPaul3, posted 04-13-2016 12:02 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
Bliyaal
Member (Idle past 2396 days)
Posts: 171
From: Quebec City, Qc, Canada
Joined: 02-17-2012


Message 219 of 478 (782000)
04-13-2016 11:39 AM
Reply to: Message 217 by Big_Al35
04-13-2016 11:18 AM


Re: On Wisconsin
Please tell us what system they should use. After all they surely wouldn't want to upset you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 11:18 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4444
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 220 of 478 (782003)
04-13-2016 11:43 AM
Reply to: Message 217 by Big_Al35
04-13-2016 11:18 AM


Re: On Wisconsin
So let me get this right; the local people of Colorado decided for themselves, that they are too dumb to vote. They thought that they should just hand their votes over to people with higher IQs (after all they are just cattle). The higher IQ delegates therefore make the decisions for their cattle, as you would expect with any good farmer. Remarkable system. And bravo to the citizens of Colorado who recognized their shortcomings.
That is just the Republicans.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 11:18 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 221 of 478 (782004)
04-13-2016 11:44 AM
Reply to: Message 217 by Big_Al35
04-13-2016 11:18 AM


On Colorado
BA writes:
So let me get this right; the local people of Colorado decided for themselves, that they are too dumb to vote.
Again, not even close.
Another chance to learn it seems.
Here is the Colorado Republican primary process.
On Tuesday March 1st Republican met in Precinct Caucuses to choose delegates to the county and district assemblies.
Between March 1st and March 26th those delegates vote to elect delegates to the Congressional District and State Conventions.
Between April 2 and April 7th the District conventions held caucuses to select delegates to the State Convention.
April 9th the state convention was held and they chose 13 of the 37 delegates that will go to the Republican National convention where the actual Republican Candidate will be selected.
This process was set up last year in August when the Colorado Republican Executive Committee voted to cancel the traditional Presidential preference Poll at the Precinct Caucuses. In particular the decisions was made that National Convention delegates will not be bound to any candidate.
So yes, the process actually was the process that the Republicans of Colorado selected to determine their input at the Republican National Convention. If it is a rigged process it was not rigged to promote any particular candidate since there were no candidates in August of last year and in fact was rigged so that no possible candidate would get all the votes.
Even after giving the votes to Cruz the Colorado delegates are still unbound and free to support any candidate at the National Republican Convention.
Far from being rigged the Colorado process assures that rigging at the state or local level is impossible.
Edited by jar, : fix sub-title

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 11:18 AM Big_Al35 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 12:06 PM jar has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 222 of 478 (782006)
04-13-2016 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 214 by Big_Al35
04-13-2016 9:14 AM


Re: On Wisconsin
Big_Al35 writes:
I just consider your 2-party system to be like our 2-party system and I never consider other possibilities because the probability of another outcome is so remote.
If you recall, the UK used to have a 2-party system, then it was a 3-party system, then it became a two-party system (not including all of the minor parties). Note that the last two parties are not the same as the first two. So the probability of change is actually quite significant.
It has been said that in Canada we have a one-and-a-half-party system: the Liberals are the dominant party but every twenty years or so we elect the Conservatives just to keep the Liberals in line.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 9:14 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 827 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 223 of 478 (782008)
04-13-2016 12:06 PM
Reply to: Message 221 by jar
04-13-2016 11:44 AM


Re: On Colorado
jar writes:
This process was set up last year in August when the Colorado Republican Executive Committee voted to cancel the traditional Presidential preference Poll
Ahhh so an executive committee made a decision without the consultation of the Republican party members. That would explain the Youtube videos of Republicans in Colorado burning their membership papers.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by jar, posted 04-13-2016 11:44 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by jar, posted 04-13-2016 12:53 PM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 224 of 478 (782012)
04-13-2016 12:53 PM
Reply to: Message 223 by Big_Al35
04-13-2016 12:06 PM


Re: On Colorado
GA writes:
Ahhh so an executive committee made a decision without the consultation of the Republican party members. That would explain the Youtube videos of Republicans in Colorado burning their membership papers.
Well, that just shows the utter ignorance of those Republicans. First, to film something and post it on YouTube is one sign of ignorance but for a party member to not know the policies they set up is perhaps even greater ignorance.
But burning membership papers is really stupid since that does not do anything. Even if they burn membership papers they are still registered as Republicans.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 12:06 PM Big_Al35 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 226 by NoNukes, posted 04-13-2016 9:18 PM jar has replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8558
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.9


(1)
Message 225 of 478 (782026)
04-13-2016 8:48 PM
Reply to: Message 211 by Big_Al35
04-13-2016 8:23 AM


We are "them." We are "they." We are the ...
By the time November has arrived - they will have thought up a new scam to ensure that the people never get what they want.
They is who? The Illuminati? The Masons? The Girl Scouts? The Reptilians of which your Queen is one?
You’re funny, Big_Al.
You see where groups to which you belong or have an affinity lose out to others but when your group wins one (at the expense of others), well, that’s just expected, the way it should be. When you lose out you can see this monolithic conspiracy at work to deprive you of the advantages you seek.
What you do not recognize is there are thousands of disparate groups all clawing and biting to get whatever advantage they can without care for what others get left behind. One group tries to set its rules to give itself maximum impact in the society and another sets its rules in an attempt to thwart the first. Writ large, the rules of the society, its laws (in this country, our Constitution) seek to keep the excesses these groups would go to in check. No one is completely happy since they never get all that they wanted.
No, the people will seldom get what they want because the people are a seething cauldron of competing and opposing interests. Plus, too many of them are too fucking stupid to know what they want until someone tells them what they want.
There are plenty of things wrong with this society that need fixing. Institutionalized racism, the powers of the mega-corporate interests, the obscene wealth of the moneyed elite, and the list goes on. But at the end of the day I and you and everyone here can associate, act in concert, speak our political minds, run for office, support and vote for those of like philosophy, oppose those with whom we disagree, all without fear of the government throwing us in jail.
I can bitch to my heart’s content because, in the long term, my rights are preserved. Which means this republic and what little democracy you actually care to acknowledge within it works.
Edited by AZPaul3, : title
Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by Big_Al35, posted 04-13-2016 8:23 AM Big_Al35 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 228 by Big_Al35, posted 04-14-2016 4:37 AM AZPaul3 has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024