quote:
And there are those who also wrongly believe the evidence led them ot the Old Earth and Evolution. So what?
The evidence supports both those things and you know it.
quote:
My point is only that I make use of evidence and don't think it's possible to believe anything without evidence.
As you have just reminded us you frequently make excuses to deny the evidence. You frequently believe things on - at best - very weak evidence, and in ignorance of evidence that is quite easily found.
quote:
And no, the nature of the conclusions to be drawn from the kind of evidence available means there can be no other conclusions drawn.
That would be pretty amazing if it were true. But it isn’t. In the Tension of Faith thread you were promoting the Gospel of John as good evidence, despite the fact that it is clearly not - and it is certainly not evidence from which no other conclusions can be drawn. You were even reduced to pulling in the false dogma of Biblical inerrancy in an attempt to support its value as evidence (and there is another belief you cling to despite clear and strong evidence to the contrary).
That makes it very clear that you don’t have evidence which matches the description I quoted above. You don’t even have good evidence.