|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total) |
| |
The Rutificador chile | |
Total: 919,507 Year: 6,764/9,624 Month: 104/238 Week: 21/83 Day: 0/4 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Creation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18651 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.2 |
and then we have the other son in Canada...
Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Your story doesn't address Tanypteryx's point at all.
And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18651 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.2 |
Tanypteryx has a valid point in regards to science. My analogy was meant to show what I believe the motive is for ICANT even arguing. His aim is not to reinvent science. His aim is to convince you that God is the one exception to the rule that there is no absolute truth. You, of course, will continue to argue.
Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18651 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.2 |
Your basic argument:
unless there is evidence pointing to a cause-effect relationship between prayer and _______, we can not conclude that prayer is effective. Which extrapolates into: "Unless there is evidence pointing to a cause-effect relationship between GOD and_________, we cannot conclude that God exists or is effective." You will never convince the old man of that! God cannot be proven using science. God is a matter of Faith. Whether God exists regardless of our faith may be proven at some point in the future. Or we may die never knowing. jar thinks we may know after we die. Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
That can't be right. He has used examples that have nothing to do with God. I think it's plain that he just doesn't understand what absolute means. My analogy was meant to show what I believe the motive is for ICANT even arguing. His aim is not to reinvent science. His aim is to convince you that God is the one exception to the rule that there is no absolute truth.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
Well, of course not. I wouldn't waste a word trying to convince him that water is wet. But hopefully somebody else will see how foolish his ideas are. Which extrapolates into: "Unless there is evidence pointing to a cause-effect relationship between GOD and_________, we cannot conclude that God exists or is effective." You will never convince the old man of that!And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18651 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.2 |
ringo writes: Is the fact that water is wet an absolute truth? I wouldn't waste a word trying to convince him that water is wet.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
It's a consensus. Is the fact that water is wet an absolute truth? And you're shooting yourself in the foot, deviating again from God being the only absolute truth.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18651 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.2 |
No. I am concurring that God is the only necessary absolute truth. All else is consensus.
Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
In what way is God "necessary"? I am concurring that God is the only necessary absolute truth.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 286 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined:
|
Hi Paul
AZPaul writes: What there is no evidence for, none at all, is the speculation that some god popped the universe into existence or had anything at all to do with anything in this universe. There is no reason, even vanishingly small, to entertain the notion. No level of confidence need be assessed. It does not enter the picture in anyway. If some evidence is found, and verified, this may change. Until then, god is out. Sounds like you believe that statement to be an absolute truth. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 286 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi Dr.
Dr writes: you could be hallucinating your sobriety. I think that would be kind of hard as I have not had a drink since 1962.
Dr writes: don't be an idiot, obviously from the context of his writing he meant two of Earth's moon. He said he looked up and saw 2 moons. Well I informed everyone there is 181 in our solar system which is many more than 2. Did you know there was 181 in our solar system? God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DrJones* Member Posts: 2341 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 7.7 |
I think that would be kind of hard as I have not had a drink since 1962.
or so you think
Well I informed everyone there is 181 in our solar system which is many more than 2.
so you ignored the context of his statement and just spouted out some information with no thought to continuing the discussion.
id you know there was 181 in our solar system?
I didn't know the exact number but I knew there were lots. I also knew want he meant by his statement and didn't try to ignore his argument.It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds soon I discovered that this rock thing was true Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world And so there was only one thing I could do Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On *not an actual doctor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 286 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi Tanypteryx
Tanypteryx writes: The scientific method since it was first defined as a methodical way to study and understand things has been a highly successful way to gain knowledge. And most of that knowledge has had to be discarded because no one was looking for the truth.
Tanypteryx writes: Was this a question or a statement? I never waste resources. There has been billions wasted because what was promoted as real science had to be discarded as junk science.
Tanyhpteryx writes: There are enough resources to do science and solve human issues. You guys aren't successfully doing either one. Not when we are 21 trillion dollars in debt. If the other world goverments decided to set up their own monetery system and dump the dollar as the world currency we would be bankrupt. Because they would not have to use dollars to do business with each other. That would mean we could not print dollars to do business with them. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 9.1 |
ICANT writes: Tanypteryx writes: The scientific method since it was first defined as a methodical way to study and understand things has been a highly successful way to gain knowledge. And most of that knowledge has had to be discarded because no one was looking for the truth. That's a bit vague. I suspect it's bullshit.
ICANT writes: Tanypteryx writes: Was this a question or a statement? I never waste resources. There has been billions wasted because what was promoted as real science had to be discarded as junk science. And more vague bullshit.
ICANT writes: Tanypteryx writes: There are enough resources to do science and solve human issues. You guys aren't successfully doing either one. Not when we are 21 trillion dollars in debt. If the other world goverments decided to set up their own monetery system and dump the dollar as the world currency we would be bankrupt. Because they would not have to use dollars to do business with each other. That would mean we could not print dollars to do business with them. Sounds like you're ready to line some more billionaire pockets to fix things. So, how come your god hasn't vanquished the evil scientists yet?What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024