Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
645 online now:
dwise1, Tanypteryx (2 members, 643 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,044 Year: 5,156/6,534 Month: 576/794 Week: 67/135 Day: 7/6 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Simplified Proof That The Universe Cannot Be Explained
Modulous
Member (Idle past 1377 days)
Posts: 7789
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


(1)
Message 141 of 342 (784511)
05-18-2016 8:44 PM


Alternative wordings, can they escape grammar traps
The boiled down version of 'why is there something rather than nothing' can lead to some odd discussions.

Consider an alternative wording that is asking the same question, perhaps this will be illuminating.

Why are some things real?

This at least sends us down the path of determining what makes something real, but I submit that nobody around here actually knows the answer so it's at best the story telling of an educated thinker.

So...maybe not thinking about how things that don't exist aren't something that can really be being when the substance of the thing of nothingness is contradicted by the absence of reality in a quasitolenic sense of being. We can wonder whether half a bee must ipso facto half not bee; can a bee be said to be, or not to be an entire bee when half the bee is not a bee?

I'm not sure any of those paths is going to be fruitful, it's been fun playing with it though. I maintain that ultimately, Rationalism is an insufficient method for analysing the world we actually live in. And since we have little else, nothing is proven except the case that nothing is proven.


  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022