The Great Creationist Fossil Failure

I had an email conversation with Safarti once. He was an ass. He is especially touchy when you ask him his qualifications to discuss the subjects he expounds on.Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

I guess a doctorate in Chemistry makes you an expert on all scientific subjects.
I do not care what his specialty is, he is a condescending ass, that is incapable of defending his own arguments.

Bing it or Google is your friend. It really isn't that hard.
George McCready Price - Wikipedia
Harold W. Clark - Wikipedia

All bullshit when looked at objectively and scientifically. Why do you think you only find this crap on fringe, nonscientific websites.

Bullshit. The reason is that there is no evidence. It has all been debunked. Present it if you have it. If not retract.

That's right people have never imagined things that never existed. That you think serpopauds mean people lived with dinosaurs means a lot about your critical thinking skills and your ability to discern reality.Are you ready to present your evidence on mermaids? Griffins?

You keep up bringing up OOPARTS but present nothing to back your claims. Just assertion after assertion.
You claim that scientists ignore them because they don't want to be ostracized. But scientists have looked at them and have found the evidence lacking. Present evidence to back your claim about why scientists don't support you. Some scientist must have told you this or else you would just be pulling arguments out of your ass. You wouldn't do that would you?
Present your artifacts and we will review them. Look at the evidence and determine where the evidence leads.
I hope they are a higher class than your claim the Narmer tablet represents actual dinosaurs.

You are presenting arguments on the formation of stromatolites and you are just studying up on them now? Maybe you should acknowledge that you are a bit put of your field of expertise.The hubris is astounding.

You present yourself as a freethinker? You really should learn what the word means. I do love your gish gallop and how you hand wave away all arguments. An academic mind should follow the evidence where ever it goes. You sir are incapable of that. Everything for you leads to the bible. All data is used to construct evidence for a biblical view. You will consider nothing else. That defines a closed mind. Do not insult others by claiming an open mind or assuming the mantle of a freethinker.

No you are not. Don't lie to us. Don't insult us. You are attempting to proselytize, nothing more nothing less. All roads lead to the bible for you. That is not being open to learning. Another lie. You think only you make good points. You wouldn't know a logical argument if it bit you on the ass. Your claim of the legitimacy of OOPARTS shows clearly an inability to possess critical thinking skills. You accept these hook, line and sinker without actually examining and processing the data and evidence.
Present them. Make a good point and logical argument for them. You should listen to the experts. They are the ones you are trying to shovel your bs to.

I assume you are not an expert in Hebrew either. Because we do have Hebrew experts that post here.

So you admit there is a contradiction.
No it is not a legal document, but you want it to be more. Do you not see the cognitive dissonance in your argument?

Still waiting for your evidence for OOPARTS.

Meaning you have no evidence. If you did you would present it. You know it does not stand up to scrutiny. You accept it on belief alone. Not if they look at the actual evidence. No one disputes that someone found them. What they are, is disputed. They have all been studied and found wanting.
Your lack of faith in them is very telling.Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

I see self awareness is not one of your strong suits.