I think that God must have decided that the best way to start afresh was to kill everything he wanted to: and so he did.
It boils down to him doing it because he wanted to. It may not be moral but he is not bound by morality as we see it because by definition anything he does is Good (even though it is not Good from a human perspective).
To beleive in the God of the Bible (rather than cherry picking the bits of his character that fit with one's own expectations) is to take the rough with the smooth.
It's a bit like being proud to be British. Over the years Great Britain has brought many positive things to the world but to deny that it has also been involved in many, many atrocities is to ignore a significant part of history.
Edited by Larni, : Do they still have DVD extras? Are they bluray extras?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
™ Version 4.2
