Summations Only

Isn't it some creationist hypothesis that the earth was flatter before the magic flood?Your cartoon represented their 'thinking'. Then you pretended that was 'scientific' thinking.Then you put up a straw man pretending that it's 'science'. No wonder you took it away. You're very dishonest, Faith.

There were huge, huge mountains during the Triassic in parts where South Africa is now. For example, the mountains of the Cape fold belt were a lot higher during the Triassic than they are now. We only see the remnants still around today. And they still are quite high.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

It's because you have no idea what geology entails. You think that the Jurassic is a "slab" of rock. It isn't.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This one is funny. He-he-he. Elephants don't peer out of rocks during our own time periods and are around on the landscapes we all experience.

You call a time period a slab of rock?

Which magic flood? There's absolutely no evidence for magic global floods on earth during the last 4.5 billion years. But, the evidence left from magic floods could have any magic properties, I guess.

I don't. Luckily for me I had one of the foremost Geochronologists in the world, being one of my undergraduate lecturers, explaining very patiently how he dated some of the "rocks" found in the Barberton Greenstone Belt. Over many years going through the basics from formation of "rocks", crystallography, geochemistry, metamorphisism, physics, etc, etc, But, Faith, I certainly can know that. Old earth models work. Very, very well. That's why old earth models work for every single one of the exploration and mining companies in my country. Geology works. Old earth models work.

No need to wonder about it. The Permian is not a rock layer.You still don't get it. The Permian is not a layer. Get it into your head. The Permian is not a layer. The Permian is not a rock layer. The Permian is not a rock layer. I know that it's not something you can try to do after all the years of indoctrination by creationists, but try to get it into your head. Here we go again. The Permian is not a rock layer. The Permian is not a rock layer. The Permian is not a rock layer.

This one was funny. Like it happened at a place called Pompeii. Except for in other places in the world. And they will move around and populate the area again. Above the old population. Just like what happened at Pompeii. And we can dig out the remains of the original population of that area later!Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

I actually live on a landscape of sediments. A landscape formed by sediments. Rivers and plains and deltas and lakes. A huge basin. With mountains and hills and flat areas formed during the Vaalian and Mokolian and Namibian and Cambrian and Permian. And now.I'm really not too sure why Faith thinks I can't live on sediments. Sand and soil, hey. I'm quite happy living on sediments. So are the mielies I'm growing.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

I'm really not to sure why Faith wrote this. They look different. They are different things. After all they are different layers. Easy to see. Even in photo's different strata are different layers. They even do LOOK LIKE different things.Faith doesn't make any sense.

I think that, after all of this, Faith still thinks that Palaeoarchaean "is a rock layer", the Mesoproterozoic "is a rock layer", the Neoproterezoic "is a rock layer", the Paleoproterozoic "is a rock layer", the Mesozoic "is a rock layer", etc. Faith got his/her information from always lying creationists who pretend that their definitions are scientific.Faith will always believe their lies. No matter how many times their lies are pointed out.

Exactly. That's why only creationists pretend that geologists do it. Creationists always tell untruths. A time period is not a layer, Faith. It's very basic.

This one is one of the funniest things I've ever seen. Oh, I dont know about that. I just "assume" that thin sections of those rocks I can study under a microscope are real...Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

Faith is not too bright. Some fossils found today are not found in the strata where they lived. For example those fossils fossils of unicelluar organisms found in the Dwyka. They were transported in the matrix from earlier rocks and redeposited in what is the Dwyka Group now. True. Some do. For example those unicellular fossils found in the Dwyka. That's why paleontogogists take specialist geologists on those rocks when they excavate those fossils. Some fossils, together with the surrounding matrix get deposited and buried somewhere else. Along with everything else. I'm really not too sure why Faith thinks that it is a problem for geology. Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.