Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9046 total)
139 online now:
AZPaul3, nwr (2 members, 137 visitors)
Newest Member: Dade
Post Volume: Total: 887,272 Year: 4,918/14,102 Month: 516/707 Week: 71/176 Day: 34/37 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Describing what the Biblical Flood would be like.
Boof
Member (Idle past 1458 days)
Posts: 97
From: Australia
Joined: 08-02-2010


Message 47 of 242 (788544)
08-02-2016 12:21 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by Faith
08-01-2016 9:37 AM


Re: Yet one more thing we can say
Faith writes:

I see no need to prove the timing, the important thing is that the geological column IS the evidence of the Flood, the whole shebang.

"The geological column" appears to be a fiction concocted by creationists, so I'm not sure how it can provide evidence of anything.

Edited by Boof, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Faith, posted 08-01-2016 9:37 AM Faith has not yet responded

  
Boof
Member (Idle past 1458 days)
Posts: 97
From: Australia
Joined: 08-02-2010


Message 225 of 242 (790573)
09-01-2016 7:16 AM
Reply to: Message 141 by ICANT
08-09-2016 3:09 AM


ICANT writes:

So you don't believe all the land mass was in one place in the past.

I thought according to scientific information it had been that way at least three times in the past.

OK ICANT, I'll bite. I challenge you to find a remotely scientific document that states all the land mass was in one place at one time and that all the water was in one place at one time.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by ICANT, posted 08-09-2016 3:09 AM ICANT has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 226 by Faith, posted 09-01-2016 9:45 AM Boof has responded

  
Boof
Member (Idle past 1458 days)
Posts: 97
From: Australia
Joined: 08-02-2010


Message 227 of 242 (790587)
09-01-2016 9:57 AM
Reply to: Message 226 by Faith
09-01-2016 9:45 AM


And you think this cartoon of reconstructed continental plates is a detailed realistic map of the late Palaeozoic? Seriously? I mean google non-marine sediments for this period - there were obviously lakes present not shown on this cartoon.

Fail


This message is a reply to:
 Message 226 by Faith, posted 09-01-2016 9:45 AM Faith has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 228 by Faith, posted 09-01-2016 10:02 AM Boof has responded

  
Boof
Member (Idle past 1458 days)
Posts: 97
From: Australia
Joined: 08-02-2010


Message 229 of 242 (790591)
09-01-2016 10:18 AM
Reply to: Message 228 by Faith
09-01-2016 10:02 AM


OK, here's what I get. Note the multiple landmasses and multiple water bodies?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by Faith, posted 09-01-2016 10:02 AM Faith has not yet responded

  
Boof
Member (Idle past 1458 days)
Posts: 97
From: Australia
Joined: 08-02-2010


Message 230 of 242 (790592)
09-01-2016 10:20 AM
Reply to: Message 228 by Faith
09-01-2016 10:02 AM


Here's another one. Definitely not all the water is in one place here...


This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by Faith, posted 09-01-2016 10:02 AM Faith has not yet responded

  
Boof
Member (Idle past 1458 days)
Posts: 97
From: Australia
Joined: 08-02-2010


Message 231 of 242 (790595)
09-01-2016 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 228 by Faith
09-01-2016 10:02 AM


And another - multiple bodies of land and water. In fact there are so many I'm amazed you couldn't find a single one.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by Faith, posted 09-01-2016 10:02 AM Faith has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 232 by ringo, posted 09-01-2016 11:47 AM Boof has not yet responded

  
Boof
Member (Idle past 1458 days)
Posts: 97
From: Australia
Joined: 08-02-2010


Message 236 of 242 (790620)
09-01-2016 8:03 PM
Reply to: Message 234 by Faith
09-01-2016 7:10 PM


Well maybe if you read a few of ICANT's posts, and my post that you responded, to you might be less confused. Let me recap.

This is from the first half a dozen or so posts of his in this thread, before I got bored:

ICANT writes:


…The water gathered to one place…
…the land mass was one single land mass that was surrounded by water as it was in one place…
…A single land mass…
…the land was in one place at one time…

And he claims that this is supported by the Bible (wrong), science (wrong) and logic (wrong). I was just focussing on the science aspect, which is why I asked him to find a scientific document that supports his claim that science agrees with him that all the land mass was in one place at one time and that all the water was in one place at one time. To bring up a cartoon representation of a Pangaea reconstruction (clearly ignoring scientific evidence there were land-locked bodies of water present during Pangaea time, and various other reconstructions showing multiple land bodies and water bodies likely did exist) is not helpful.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 234 by Faith, posted 09-01-2016 7:10 PM Faith has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by Faith, posted 09-01-2016 8:08 PM Boof has responded

  
Boof
Member (Idle past 1458 days)
Posts: 97
From: Australia
Joined: 08-02-2010


Message 238 of 242 (790623)
09-01-2016 8:16 PM
Reply to: Message 237 by Faith
09-01-2016 8:08 PM


I'm led to believe that you agree with ICANT that Pangaea was a single land mass combining all of our current continents yet without a single lake, loch, pond, lagoon, waterhole within. No big deal I guess, but it does make me wonder what all of those humans and animals wandering around at the time were drinking...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 237 by Faith, posted 09-01-2016 8:08 PM Faith has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 239 by Faith, posted 09-01-2016 8:26 PM Boof has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021