And you think this cartoon of reconstructed continental plates is a detailed realistic map of the late Palaeozoic? Seriously? I mean google non-marine sediments for this period - there were obviously lakes present not shown on this cartoon.
Well maybe if you read a few of ICANT's posts, and my post that you responded, to you might be less confused. Let me recap.
This is from the first half a dozen or so posts of his in this thread, before I got bored:
…The water gathered to one place… …the land mass was one single land mass that was surrounded by water as it was in one place… …A single land mass… …the land was in one place at one time…
And he claims that this is supported by the Bible (wrong), science (wrong) and logic (wrong). I was just focussing on the science aspect, which is why I asked him to find a scientific document that supports his claim that science agrees with him that all the land mass was in one place at one time and that all the water was in one place at one time. To bring up a cartoon representation of a Pangaea reconstruction (clearly ignoring scientific evidence there were land-locked bodies of water present during Pangaea time, and various other reconstructions showing multiple land bodies and water bodies likely did exist) is not helpful.
I'm led to believe that you agree with ICANT that Pangaea was a single land mass combining all of our current continents yet without a single lake, loch, pond, lagoon, waterhole within. No big deal I guess, but it does make me wonder what all of those humans and animals wandering around at the time were drinking...