Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9071 total)
114 online now:
AZPaul3, Tanypteryx (2 members, 112 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Upcoming Birthdays: Percy
Post Volume: Total: 893,098 Year: 4,210/6,534 Month: 424/900 Week: 130/150 Day: 23/38 Hour: 0/1

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Is A Materialist View Less Parsimonious?
Posts: 4065
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004
Member Rating: 2.9

Message 4 of 42 (789028)
08-09-2016 3:20 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by mike the wiz
08-09-2016 7:55 AM

I do not think itta means...
mike the wiz writes:

Obviously I can appreciate that, "supernature" is assumed, and has to be taken by faith, as it is implied by the natural creation. I admit that by faith we believe in God.

However the materialistic creation story of atheism, obviously doesn't need to assume a supernatural realm which might make it more parsimonious in that regard which I would concede.
However, how many more assumptions/entities/variables, must be assumed in order to accept materialism?


Materialism doesn’t make assumptions. That’s the whole point of being a “materialist”… you only deal with what is material… what you can touch, see, sense… what you can show to be real. The entire idea of materialism is to not make any assumptions.

The rest of your post only includes assigning the word “assumption” to a materialist hypothesis which is then tested and has either been shown to be accurate (now a fact) or shown to be false (discarded).

Your belief in God may only have one assumption. But one is more than none.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mike the wiz, posted 08-09-2016 7:55 AM mike the wiz has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Phat, posted 08-09-2016 4:30 PM Stile has seen this message

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022