DOCJ writes:
If person A is biased, and B, and they debate person C who is just spectating is seeing the bias.
To all the "C" people reading this forum... you will be seen as person "A" for as long as you remain just posting links and not discussing them in your own words.
The tactic you're using ("I'm pointing out bias! Prove yourselves to me!!!") is one that any onlooker recognizes as someone who is merely protecting something and trying to deflect the conversation away from themselves.
As a parent pleads to their children: "Use your words."
If you have something to discuss that actually goes against the current scientific idea... by all means
discuss it.
Or if you think you've discovered something that eats away at a current scientific assumption... by all means
discuss it.
But posting links, claiming to be unbiased, and pointing fingers around without being able to discuss why or explain a better option is not searching for truth. It just seems like you don't actually have any confidence in what you're doing. People with confidence don't have a problem discussing their position.
There are always reasons not to think something is true.
That's why science never claims that anything is "true." They only claim that things are "as true as we can tell from this information."
That way, as new information is
discussed they can adopt or change as required to get closer to the truth.
Your lack of
discussion on your reasons-why-you-think-something-isn't-true is exactly what gives you away.
If you wanted to get to the truth... you would
discuss the issues. Understand the current scientific ideas. Understand your own dissention. Understand why it's already been adopted and dealt with. Understanding and
discussion leads to uncovering more truth.
Just sitting around "being unbiased" does exactly that... nothing.