Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,397 Year: 3,654/9,624 Month: 525/974 Week: 138/276 Day: 12/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Glenn Morton's Evidence Examined
vimesey
Member (Idle past 93 days)
Posts: 1398
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011


(1)
Message 370 of 427 (791645)
09-19-2016 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 369 by Faith
09-19-2016 2:45 PM


Hi Faith.
I think the thing that people are saying here, is that standard geology can infer the likelihood of the location of oil bearing strata, before they are physically located. And it does so using the scientific method.
The question posed is how YEC thinking can infer the likelihood of the location of the oil bearing strata, before they are physically located.
It's true that dating isn't needed to locate the rocks - but old earth dating makes it very likely that you will locate them. Our position is that YEC thinking doesn't do the same.

Could there be any greater conceit, than for someone to believe that the universe has to be simple enough for them to be able to understand it ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 369 by Faith, posted 09-19-2016 2:45 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 372 by Faith, posted 09-19-2016 3:28 PM vimesey has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024