The 2016 United States Presidential Election

What part of "crime of aggression" covers one vote? And what part absolves the voters who voted for the voter?

Wow, you already read both of Mod's posts? Pretty impressive ringo.

Then why did they re-elect almost every incumbent Republican running for Congress? They even re-elected Blunt in Missouri whose kids are famous lobbyists, for crying out loud. He is as establishment as it gets. If there is a monster in the swamp, its Blunt.Edited by Taq, : No reason given.Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

or an atheist

No, he clearly does not accept your claims.He agree with you on the moral argument. But he disagrees on the legal argument (you mentioned war crimes, which is a legal position).I voted for Obama and against Hillary in 2008, because of her position on the war. But I never thought her a war criminal. Modulous seems to not understand the difference. In 2008, Clinton was still defending her position on the war. In 2016, she has admitted that she was wrong. That's an important difference.Still, I agree that she is a flawed candidate. But so were her primary opponents. And the primary voters preferred Clinton. By the way, I voted for Sanders in the primary.You still have not provided any evidence that she was a war criminal. And you still have not provided any evidence that she is responsible for any civilian death in Iraq.And no, I am not being dishonest. You are making strong claims for which you provide no evidence at all.I'm not arguing that you should like Clinton. I'm not a fan myself. I'm just pointing out that you have been making strong claims with no supporting evidence. Believe what you want, but don't demand that other people share your opinions. There's a congressional record. Can you quote from the congression record exactly when she voted to murder the children and parents of anybody, and with the exact wording on which she voted?

81% of evangelical and born-again Christians voted Trump.What kind of religionist votes for the devil?

There are many votes that don't actually effect anything. Perhaps most votes are of that kind. Does it follow that they are all wasted? She was the elected representative of the people of New York. The problem she was solving, was to represent her constituents. It was not a vote on war vs. negotiations.The question of war vs. negotiations was a question that the president had to answer. That was not a question on which Clinton had any input. Her vote was on whether or not to support the president's decision. She was representing her constituents. Did her vote represent the view of her constituents at that time, or did not not? I happen to think that it did represent the view of her constituents.If I had been making that vote, I would have decided that this was a time to represent what I considered the best interest of the constituents, rather than their view. But that's always a difficult decision for a politician to make.Clinton might possibly have believed that Bush would use political negotiations, and not go to war except as a last resort. If it were me, then by that time it seemed clear to me that Bush had already made the decision and was just trying to make it sound more palatable. I was more cynical about Bush than Clinton was.I think you make too much of this vote.I was against Clinton in 2008, but not because of her vote. I was against her, because she was still defending that vote when should have been obvious by then that her vote was a mistake.

What would happen if Obama ran for President in 2020?Michelle Obama?

It looks to me like they made their case plainly over the last few years that they have no interest in governing. Their plan, now that the ball is in their court, is to turn it into a wrecking ball and use it to demolish our government and our civilization.Our country and the planet are in for some seriously bad times for what looks like the rest of my life. There were a lot of miscalculations. I wonder how much more pissed off those people are going to be when they find out how they are going to be rewarded for their votes by the republicans?

Trump would have her imprisoned or assassinated. He made it plain during the campaign that either alternative for his opponent is ok with him.He is a psychopath and a narcissist and he will soon be the most powerful person on the planet. He is convinced that he can do anything he wants with no consequences. Remember, he said he could shoot someone in public and not lose any votes.He will be the last president of the United States of America.

Yes, I am sure. It was from a Lebanese massacre in 1982. It was from the The Sabra and Shatila massacre .

What makes you think that we will ever see 2020?I mean that in both senses. Will anyone still be alive in 2020? Will there be an election in 2020?

You just answered your own question.

If no one is alive in 2020 then it is a moot question however the evidence is that the US has survived many such incidents, a Civil War that was anything but civil, depressions and recessions, natural disaster, pandemics, Presidents like Reagan and the Bushs and Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnson (maybe the closest comparison to il Donald), several World Wars, bank collapses, hyper inflation and stagflation.