Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 88 (8993 total)
47 online now:
Phat (AdminPhat), ringo (2 members, 45 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,183 Year: 10,931/23,288 Month: 183/1,763 Week: 150/390 Day: 39/32 Hour: 3/0

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Disadvantageous Mutations: Figures
Posts: 4205
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 2.2

Message 14 of 93 (794566)
11-17-2016 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Pressie
11-17-2016 7:42 AM

First, I want to say that I do want to give Greg the benefit of the doubt and will continue to try to deal with him in good faith.

There is a dishonest creationist tactic in which a creationist will join a forum presenting himself as someone who is fair-minded and wants to objectively evaluate both sides of the argument. However, they avoid examining the creationist claims and instead concentrate on the "evolution model" (which bares only very superficial similarity to actual evolution). It doesn't take long for them to finally drop the pretense and they reveal themselves as yet another typical YEC trying to attack his "evolution" boogey man.

I'm sure that there's fundamentalist/creationist training materials out there that present this tactic (I had read a lot of such materials during my association with the "Jesus Freak" fundies circa 1970 and I continue to see them applied to this day). And certainly, the best way to get away with this dodge is to avoid participating in the discussion, which is what we've observed Greg doing.

Of course, we should expect the smarter and more honest creationists to reach a point where they start to question what they've been taught and try to seek the truth. It is unfortunate that this dishonest creationist trick should poison the well for them. Certainly, an honest seeker of the truth should be concentrating on examining the creationist position instead of asking the opposing side to defend the false position that the creationists have present as being the opposing position. At the very least, an honest seeker of the truth should be concerned with what the terminology actually means and what the science actually says.

As I said, I will continue to give Greg the benefit of the doubt here and continue to try to take him at face value. Even though I've been around this particular park far too many times already.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Pressie, posted 11-17-2016 7:42 AM Pressie has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by PaulK, posted 11-17-2016 10:55 AM dwise1 has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020