Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8925 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 08-21-2019 1:28 AM
64 online now:
dwise1, PaulK, Theodoric (3 members, 61 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Jedothek
Post Volume:
Total: 860,153 Year: 15,189/19,786 Month: 1,912/3,058 Week: 286/404 Day: 4/96 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
1
2Next
Author Topic:   A good summary of so called human evolution.
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 83 of 184 (808073)
05-08-2017 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Admin
01-16-2017 10:41 AM


Re: Thread Information is true
Percy, you should allow discussion rather than deeming it mis-information just because you disagree with it.

The OP comments were solid and verifiable. It was a good summary.....

But it should be noted that most evolutionists here state that primates ancestor was batsmeaning in their opinion, our further back ancestor is and was bats.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Admin, posted 01-16-2017 10:41 AM Admin has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by Coyote, posted 05-08-2017 1:10 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 85 by Taq, posted 05-08-2017 3:23 PM Davidjay has responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 86 of 184 (808399)
05-10-2017 2:37 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by Taq
05-08-2017 3:23 PM


Re: Bats are our ancestors but not our relatives ? Evolutionary double speak
Yes, your words and lingo and double speak 'evolutionary' wording is tricky....

Davidjay can't figure out how his cousins can be his relatives while not being his ancestors.

Evolutionists cant figure out where we came from, so just make it up as they go, thinking no one would dare challenge them on such ridicuolous conclusions concerning our family tree.

But go ahead explain, how our relatives are not our ancestors. The floor is yours. Or you can get other evolutionists to attack me the messenger rather than explain your message.

Do answer Taq, as I got you guys and gals again....

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Taq, posted 05-08-2017 3:23 PM Taq has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by Taq, posted 05-10-2017 2:44 PM Davidjay has responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 88 of 184 (808407)
05-10-2017 2:54 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by Taq
05-10-2017 2:44 PM


Re: Bats are our ancestors but not our relatives ? Evolutionary double speak
No, three of you said that primates (chimps included) came from bats.

So according to your wild unproven theory, bats are our common ancestor or are chimps also in there, or did they mate together upside down and produce right side up humans.

You must realise that your outlandish theories are laughable to say the least when you try and explain, how our ancestors are not our cousins and uncles, and relatives...

But thanks for the chuckle, but again I must ask you to expand your thoughts more than into one sentence. Expand, explain, how our ancestors are not our relatives. Or you can say, you made a rather large MISTAKE, and clarify your LARGE MISTAKE.

But do try and get those chimps back into a logical branch either before humans appeared or after, but surely not coupled together with bats. It clogs up your bel-fries....

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by Taq, posted 05-10-2017 2:44 PM Taq has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-10-2017 3:02 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 90 by jar, posted 05-10-2017 3:06 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 91 by Taq, posted 05-10-2017 3:12 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 92 by RAZD, posted 05-10-2017 3:55 PM Davidjay has responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 93 of 184 (808691)
05-12-2017 9:15 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by RAZD
05-10-2017 3:55 PM


Re: Bats are our ancestors but not our relatives ? Evolutionary double speak
So where did humans come from ?

People stated previously we came from ****, and now try to say they or I, am lying.

So evolutionists try again and tell us where humans came from ? What branch did we come from ?

My threads get shut down because apparrently I dont answer questions, so do please respond.... as there are multitudes of you HERE posting.

Tell us where humans came from


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by RAZD, posted 05-10-2017 3:55 PM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Davidjay, posted 05-12-2017 9:19 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 95 by Coyote, posted 05-12-2017 9:36 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 99 by RAZD, posted 05-12-2017 1:20 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 100 by RAZD, posted 05-12-2017 3:19 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 101 by RAZD, posted 05-12-2017 5:17 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 119 by Taq, posted 05-16-2017 1:00 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 94 of 184 (808692)
05-12-2017 9:19 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Davidjay
05-12-2017 9:15 AM


Re: Bats are our ancestors but not our relatives ? Evolutionary double speak
Psttt... notice the loophole that evolutionists snuck through saying there is a difference between cousins and ancestors.

When the original statement was relatives, as relatives includes parents and grandparents, and those with direct links to us.

Watch out evolutionists are tricky in their wording and semantics and branching. Read carefully as they twist and turn, and evade answering questions, like who was our ancestor ?

One minutes it a *** and the next minute they can;t decide, even after decades of digging in their holes and trying to artistically put together bones.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Davidjay, posted 05-12-2017 9:15 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by Taq, posted 05-12-2017 11:13 AM Davidjay has responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 97 of 184 (808728)
05-12-2017 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 96 by Taq
05-12-2017 11:13 AM


Re: Bats are our ancestors but not our relatives ? Evolutionary double speak
No relatives means relatives and not merely cousins. You cant flip flop and change meanings and definitions.

So just tell us where we humans came from ?

If not from bats, as *** and *** and *** and **** suggested, do tell us where we came from...

Who are our forefathers, are grandparents, back and backwards in time.

For surely after all these decades one or some of you must know who are forefathers or original species was.

Maybe I shall ask if we can start a NEW TOPIC on this subject. But I would ask that evolutionists answer the question rather than hiding away in silence, and sulking saying nobody understands them and their wording.

Just simply tell us who are ancesters were ?

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Taq, posted 05-12-2017 11:13 AM Taq has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Taq, posted 05-12-2017 11:49 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 106 of 184 (809110)
05-16-2017 10:47 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by RAZD
05-15-2017 3:01 PM


Re: Cousins not ancestors, once again.
Lets see what the confused evolutionists now say....

Euarconta is neither Primate nor Scandentia, but ancestral to both.

Euarconta is neither Primate nor Scandentia, but ancestral to both.

Euarconta is neither Primate nor Scandentia, but ancestral to both.

OK, but lets not misunderstand their artists conception of our ancestrial tree..and lets not forget all the people HEREIN who said we came from our relatives the bats and treeshrews and Euarconta . Lets read it again

Euarconta is neither Primate nor Scandentia, but ancestral to both.

Notice the slippery speech. Euarconta is our ancestor, but he or she says it is neither Primate... NO its suppose to be our ancestor our foreftaher, where we braanched off from. Did you catch their deception, intentional deception and con.

Nevertheless he or she (I dont know their gender) says Euarconta is neither Primate nor Scandentia, but ancestral to both.

Euarconta is an ancestor to us primates..

I finally again proved that dumb stupid evolutionists think we came from Euarconta... they said it again....

and again.

Lets read it again.

Euarconta is neither Primate nor Scandentia, but ancestral to both.

Yup thats what he or she admitted.

I win, creation wins, treeshrews lose..


Evolutyionists are used to forcing their theory on students and scientists. They are not used to answering any questions on this theory, because it is their religion. And as a religion it must be accepted by faith.... It is not science and it is not logical or rational and has no facts behind it. Evolution is a con and a LIE. A big one, but because it is forced on the gullible and on students, they must accept it. This their modus operandi...and so when faced with sane biological opposition, they can only be subjective rather than objective.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by RAZD, posted 05-15-2017 3:01 PM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Taq, posted 05-16-2017 11:04 AM Davidjay has responded
 Message 122 by RAZD, posted 05-17-2017 12:03 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 108 of 184 (809134)
05-16-2017 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by Taq
05-16-2017 11:04 AM


Re: Cousins not ancestors, once again.
No your family tree clears states that E......'s are our ancestors.

Please stick to your tree and quite mixing up your branches.

Primates are labeled after and down the branch. You say, E's are our ancestors. Quite being so gutless in your theory. Stand up for it and be proud of your ancestors you think came before us.

I mean, you are protected HERE because the administration disallows me or any of us from questioning your MISSING LINK of E's being our ancestors, so switch to your subjective attacks on me (and others) as you obviously are protected from expanding or explaining your data or imaginations or artists depictions.

Humans came from humans say Creationists

Humans came from E-beings that are now extinct..... how convenient....

Evolution is a con, brethren and non brethren.


Evolutyionists are used to forcing their theory on students and scientists. They are not used to answering any questions on this theory, because it is their religion. And as a religion it must be accepted by faith.... It is not science and it is not logical or rational and has no facts behind it. Evolution is a con and a LIE. A big one, but because it is forced on the gullible and on students, they must accept it. This their modus operandi...and so when faced with sane biological opposition, they can only be subjective rather than objective.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Taq, posted 05-16-2017 11:04 AM Taq has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Davidjay, posted 05-16-2017 11:49 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 112 by Taq, posted 05-16-2017 12:11 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 109 of 184 (809135)
05-16-2017 11:49 AM
Reply to: Message 108 by Davidjay
05-16-2017 11:47 AM


Re: Cousins not ancestors, once again.
Evolutionists are linguists as mentioned,

Taq as an evolutionists is an expert linguist and semantic teacher and preacher.

He or she knows no math and obviously doesn;t know logic because logic is math is SET LAW......

The set of primates is not concentric with Euarchonta's. They are not the same... E's came before according to evolutionists. They are suppose to be our ancestors, our forefathers.

E's supposedly branched off into many species.. (not again that evolution teaches branching, which again they deny when faced with its racism doctrine.......) or sub branches.

E's are not all primates...... there are different branches... supposedly ...theoretically with the insane theory of evolution.

E's are not all primates,

Lets try and find evolutionists Missing LINK and see how artists drew them up..

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


Evolutyionists are used to forcing their theory on students and scientists. They are not used to answering any questions on this theory, because it is their religion. And as a religion it must be accepted by faith.... It is not science and it is not logical or rational and has no facts behind it. Evolution is a con and a LIE. A big one, but because it is forced on the gullible and on students, they must accept it. This their modus operandi...and so when faced with sane biological opposition, they can only be subjective rather than objective.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Davidjay, posted 05-16-2017 11:47 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by Taq, posted 05-16-2017 12:32 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 110 of 184 (809139)
05-16-2017 12:00 PM


Pics of E's
Here they are....

our ancestors according to evolutionary theory and according to evolutionists HERE

https://www.google.ca/search?tbm=isch&hl=en-CA&source=hp&...

Cant you see the similiarity...... you just need a good artist, even though the variation tends to be rather diverse for an extinct species.

Hallelujah say the evolutionists, we have our MISSING LINK....


Evolutyionists are used to forcing their theory on students and scientists. They are not used to answering any questions on this theory, because it is their religion. And as a religion it must be accepted by faith.... It is not science and it is not logical or rational and has no facts behind it. Evolution is a con and a LIE. A big one, but because it is forced on the gullible and on students, they must accept it. This their modus operandi...and so when faced with sane biological opposition, they can only be subjective rather than objective.

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 111 of 184 (809140)
05-16-2017 12:06 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by Taq
05-16-2017 11:04 AM


Re:Tag, you need a new artist
Taq, you have to draw up a new tree, and develop new branching...

Your old tree, showed E turning into primates.......

Primates ARE Euarochonta. You keep getting this wrong. Primates are Euarochonta in the same way that Great Danes and Chihuahuas are dogs. However, this doesn't mean that Chihuahuas are ancestral to Great Danes just because they are both dogs.

No, your tree showed E turning into two different species..... scandentia and Dermapterra,,,, whose ancestor was paraprimates.. (obviously extinct and probably just another made up missing link..covered up with a fancy scientific sounding name)

Hence logically you have to redraw your tree branching to show that E's descendants are only one KIND

or you can say hysterically that all humans are E's and all E's other descendants in that branching are also humans.

Whats good for the dogs is good for the E's, but you must be consistent.... as you are not !!

So keep drawing and hire a new improved artist for your new theory.

.

Because we aren't dermoptera's or scandentia's

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


Evolutyionists are used to forcing their theory on students and scientists. They are not used to answering any questions on this theory, because it is their religion. And as a religion it must be accepted by faith.... It is not science and it is not logical or rational and has no facts behind it. Evolution is a con and a LIE. A big one, but because it is forced on the gullible and on students, they must accept it. This their modus operandi...and so when faced with sane biological opposition, they can only be subjective rather than objective.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Taq, posted 05-16-2017 11:04 AM Taq has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Taq, posted 05-16-2017 12:14 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 116 of 184 (809153)
05-16-2017 12:50 PM


And all our ancestors are now extinct
And all our ancestors are now extinct... how convenient..

I quess we got magic beneficial mutations which elevated us into a higher superior race than our cousin tree shrews and uncle bats and above the Euarconta organisms.

Pity we are not allowed to discuss this on a New Topic and discuss Missing Links.... its very embarassing for evolutionists, so I reckon that answers that question.

Primates ancestors were Euarconta say the evolutionist...

Do take a look at their supposed pics again... and pic out your ancestor if you choose.


Evolutyionists are used to forcing their theory on students and scientists. They are not used to answering any questions on this theory, because it is their religion. And as a religion it must be accepted by faith.... It is not science and it is not logical or rational and has no facts behind it. Evolution is a con and a LIE. A big one, but because it is forced on the gullible and on students, they must accept it. This their modus operandi...and so when faced with sane biological opposition, they can only be subjective rather than objective.

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by ringo, posted 05-16-2017 12:55 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 118 by Taq, posted 05-16-2017 12:58 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 120 by Tangle, posted 05-16-2017 1:05 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 121 by caffeine, posted 05-16-2017 4:05 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 123 of 184 (809328)
05-17-2017 7:45 PM


Where di humans come from Raz ?

What is our ancestor ?

What species mutated into us, before we supposedly became primates ?

************************

Evolutionists hide behind classiofications and semantic names that sound scientific but contain no facts, no actual animals or species.

Its all a con folks, and READERS.

evolution is a hige lie forced on our students and on the dumb and ignorant unscientific ones.


Being told to "Fuck you I can fucking write whatever I want" by CatsEye to me is against the rules of civil debate, ) at http://www.evcforum.net/dm.php?control=page&t=17167&mpp=1... ...message 145 )but this board says its acceptable language if done by an evolutionist.... and then suspend me rather than him.
.
Evolutionists are used to forcing their theory on students and scientists. They are not used to answering any questions on this theory, because it is their religion. And as a religion it must be accepted by faith.... It is not science and it is not logical or rational and has no facts behind it. Evolution is a con and a LIE. A big one, but because it is forced on the gullible and on students, they must accept it. This their modus operandi...and so when faced with sane biological opposition, they can only be subjective rather than objective.

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by RAZD, posted 05-17-2017 8:19 PM Davidjay has responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 125 of 184 (809685)
05-20-2017 10:40 AM
Reply to: Message 124 by RAZD
05-17-2017 8:19 PM


Re: Evolutionists refuse to answer, whos our ancestor
Evolutionists refuse to answer this question ?

Thats not called spamming, thats called evasive debating> I get penalized all the time for not answering the multitude of evolutionists insecere questions and sincere questions.. But evolutionists refuse to answer this one ?

Complainabout answering this one, and when it seems they answer it with grapghs and approximities I get penalized for it. So answer the question.

Its on topic, it concerns human evolution.

Who were our ancestors.

Give us a flow chart from the beginning ?

Our debate earlier was who was the ancestor of primates... just answer the question with a species or kind or extinct creature, even if hypothetical or imaginary or just an artists conception from a few bones.

Stand up and be proud of your ancestors without complaining and screaming Spam Spam... when I asked a sincere question. You have had decades to figure it out, just post your answer... in two words or less.... or whatever.

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


Being told to "Fuck you I can fucking write whatever I want" by CatsEye to me I thought would be against the rules Here( at http://www.evcforum.net/dm.php?control=page&t=17167&mpp=1... ...message 145 ) but this board says there are no rules concerning languageHERE, so allow me to repost Cats eyes comments as logically therefore his words can not offend anyone....and can be part of my signature..... because it is not against the rules

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by RAZD, posted 05-17-2017 8:19 PM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by RAZD, posted 05-20-2017 11:07 AM Davidjay has responded

    
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 557 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 127 of 184 (809698)
05-20-2017 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 126 by RAZD
05-20-2017 11:07 AM


Re: Ancestors were spelled different
Raz says through his posted graph that humans came from

( http://www.evcforum.net/Messages.php?control=replynew&m=8... Message 328 )

Humans came from Homininae, which came from Hominidae which evolved from Hominoidae which evolved from Hominoidea....

I win, evolutionist is such a lie and so bogus, to be almsot laughable if it wasnt taken so seriously by the evolutionists.

Its just semantics brethren and non brethren, just word manipulation and spelling...

Read it again and marvel, that evolutionists actually believe our ancestors followed this spelling lineage......

Humans ancestor was Homininae, which came from Hominidae which evolved from Hominoidae which evolved from Hominoidea....

More concisely put in a flow chart for clarity

Human-Homininae-Hominidae-Hominoidae-Hominoidea....

There it is BREAKING NEWS, we humans evolved from Hominoidea's 20 million years ago..... our ancestors are hominoidea's..

I say our ancestors were humans, the same as us.

Evolutionists say different, you choose your ancestor, and see if spelling is the defining factor or whether truth and science and common sense prevails.

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by RAZD, posted 05-20-2017 11:07 AM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by RAZD, posted 05-20-2017 11:48 AM Davidjay has responded
 Message 131 by RAZD, posted 05-20-2017 3:37 PM Davidjay has responded

    
1
2Next
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019