Trump's order on immigration and the wacko liberal response

Why should Cat worry about facts when reading Facebook memes is all he needs?

In other words
"Don't confuse me with facts, my mind is made up."Liar for Jesus and Trump now, I see. Disgusting that you claim to be a Christian but live your life as an antithesis of what your religion professes and support people that are vile, craven and know little to nothing about the religion you profess to follow.It is amazing that "Christians" are all ready to quote passages from the Old Testament, but seem to be at utter loss for New testament quotations to support their craven beliefs these days.

Timothy McVeigh, Dylan Roof, Alexandre Bissonnette, Wade Michael Page, Scott Roeder, Jim Adkisson, Eric Rudolph, Robert Deer.Lets look historically
have you heard of Northern Ireland.
Crusades
English Civil war
Gunpowder Plot
Ku Klux Klan
PogromsThis took me 2 mins to come up with. Quit being a liar for Jesus. Most of these are based upon the same principals you spout here every day. You want to be able to force people to live by what you think is right. Everyone else should submit to Christian domination. Christians who do not believe as you do are not Christians.

It applies to everyone in the borders of the USA.

Take that up with Supreme Court rulings since the founding of the republic. What you spout is sedition and treason.

Not an expression here. Please elaborate.

Caps don't help. You are still wrong.
Please drop the caps. Makes you look foolish and whiney.

Court rulings have made the 14th very clear.

According to most Islamic clerics, Islamic terrorists are violating Islamic principals. Or are you more of an expert an Islam than they are?
Islamic Statements Against Terrorism | Charles Kurzman

quote:

---

That letter outlines 24 violations of Islamic Law, noting it's forbidden to kill the innocent, torture people, and disfigure the dead.

---

Muslims Using Sharia Law Against ISISWhy are you holding Muslims to a different standard?I notice you didn't address these people. Do you agree with what some of them did? Or did they violate Christian principals too?BTW Catholics are Christians.

So I could expect non-christians to be better experts on Christianity than Christian clerics. Ok if you say so. Evidence please. But I guess no different than you a Liar for Christ.109 verses calling for murder huh? How many in your bible do the same or worse? Have you read your bible? Try Deuteronomy and Joshua to start.

quote:

---

Interpretation is all, and that changes over time. Religions have their core values, their non-negotiable truths, but they also surround themselves with many stories not essential to the message. Any religion that exists over long eras absorbs many of the ideas and beliefs of the community in which it finds itself, and reflects those in its writings. Over time, thinkers and theologians reject or underplay those doctrines and texts that contradict the underlying principles of the faith as it develops. However strong the textual traditions justifying war and conflict, believers come instead to stress love and justice. Of course Muslim societies throughout history have engaged in jihad, in holy war, and have found textual warrant so to do. But over time, other potent strains in the religion moved away from literal warfare. However strong the calls to jihad, struggle, in Islamic thought, the hugely influential Sufi orders taught that the real struggle was the inner battle to control one's sinful human instincts, and this mattered vastly more than any pathetic clash of swords and spears. The Greater Jihad is one fought in the soul.
Often, such reforming thinkers are so successful that the troublesome words fade utterly from popular consciousness, even among believers who think of themselves as true fundamentalists. Most Christian and Jewish believers, even those who are moderately literate in scriptural terms, read their own texts extraordinarily selectively. How many Christian preachers would today find spiritual sustenance in Joshua's massacres? How many American Christians know that the New Testament demands that women cover their hair, at least in church settings, and that Paul's Epistles include more detailed rules on the subject than anything written in the Koran? This kind of holy amnesia is a basic component of religious development. It does not imply rejecting scriptures, but rather reading them in the total context of the religion as it progresses through history.
Alternatively, one can choose to deny that historical experience, and seize on any available word or verse that authorizes the violence that is already taking place - but once someone has decided to do that, it scarcely matters what the text actually says.

---

Violent passages in the Koran and the Bible - The Boston GlobePersonally I think Islam, Christianity and Judaism are all vile oppressive violent religions. The legacy of Abraham(who wasn't real) is one of hate, xenophobia and oppression. A pox on all their houses.
But that you hold others to a different standard is disgusting.

Faith's hate and xenophobia forces all other religions to meet a higher standard. This is what I find amazing about religious people. Their own faith and religion does not have to meet the high ideals they old others too.
I guess they know they cannot meet them.Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.Edited by Theodoric, : change of subtopic

So as usual you have no sources to back your deluded beliefs. Drop the caps. They make you look even more unstable than you even are.You might try and actually read the koran. Not just some haters version of it. I agree it is vile and xenophobic. Not any different than the bible you claim to follow.

I really don't think Faith has every really read a bible. I am sure Faith has looked at the words, but reading is much more than sounding out words. Comprehension is a vital part of reading. I think that is sorely lacking with Faith and many so-called christians.

Provide the passages.

Now you should learn some arabic to know what it actually says.
Just Ask Islam - Does Islam Say: "Kill The Infidels"?As for your source.
A fault with this website is that they tend to focus a lot on passages from the Quran to justify why they think that the Islamic ideology is inherently suboptimal. This type of argument only works for people who believe that their book represents their entire religion. While these people exist, (and are not really uncommon), this does not say much about Islamic ideology, but rather fundamentalist Islamic ideology, which is something different. Given the inherent contradictions present in many religious texts, interpreting the book rigorously is necessarily a subjective exercise.
How objective is the Religion of Peace website? - Quora