|
Author
|
Topic: Trump's order on immigration and the wacko liberal response
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 788 of 993 (806011)
04-22-2017 8:45 AM
|
Reply to: Message 613 by Faith
02-09-2017 11:02 PM
|
|
Re: wondering
You only need to get the bad ones. The good ones are fine. Simple. Oh, wait....
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 613 by Faith, posted 02-09-2017 11:02 PM | | Faith has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 798 of 993 (806077)
04-22-2017 6:53 PM
|
Reply to: Message 789 by Faith
04-22-2017 8:49 AM
|
|
Re: wondering
He's two now (where does the time go?). I can't seem to figure out how to up load a pic of the little tyke, though 
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 789 by Faith, posted 04-22-2017 8:49 AM | | Faith has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 826 by ringo, posted 04-23-2017 2:16 PM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 801 of 993 (806095)
04-23-2017 1:48 AM
|
Reply to: Message 800 by Dredge
04-23-2017 1:44 AM
|
|
Re: wondering
To be fair, wherever you find people, you'll find killers.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 800 by Dredge, posted 04-23-2017 1:44 AM | | Dredge has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 805 of 993 (806114)
04-23-2017 3:47 AM
|
Reply to: Message 802 by Dredge
04-23-2017 1:59 AM
|
|
Re: wondering
Fair enough. But remember that that means you're ignoring all of the non Muslim killers out there.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 802 by Dredge, posted 04-23-2017 1:59 AM | | Dredge has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 806 of 993 (806115)
04-23-2017 3:48 AM
|
Reply to: Message 804 by Faith
04-23-2017 2:50 AM
|
|
Re: Missing the point
No, it's the people who do the murders who are responsible for the murder: not people disagree with you.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 804 by Faith, posted 04-23-2017 2:50 AM | | Faith has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 807 of 993 (806117)
04-23-2017 3:59 AM
|
Reply to: Message 803 by Faith
04-23-2017 2:01 AM
|
|
Re: wondering
Not so. Christianity used to be choc full or killers and today has more that it's fair share of child molestation enthusiasts but nowadays the faith attracts a less blood thirsty (though you still can't trust some of them with children) crowd. I don't think God has changed: but the people who flock to his banner have. Chances are Islam is going to become nice Islam over time the same way Christianity became nice Christianity over time. As your Mr Trump says, bad people doing bad things is bad. Bigly.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 803 by Faith, posted 04-23-2017 2:01 AM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 808 by Faith, posted 04-23-2017 4:36 AM | | Larni has not replied | | | Message 832 by Dredge, posted 04-26-2017 1:01 AM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 829 of 993 (806198)
04-23-2017 5:28 PM
|
Reply to: Message 826 by ringo
04-23-2017 2:16 PM
|
|
Re: wondering
My understanding is that I would have to upload an image to the Inter Nets and like to the URL. Will a The Face Books pic do?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 826 by ringo, posted 04-23-2017 2:16 PM | | ringo has seen this message but not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 831 by Stile, posted 04-24-2017 8:27 AM | | Larni has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2
