In message 612 I said:
Bees are essential or near essential for the good of the Earth's ecology, while humans have a gross negative impact.
Agree or disagree?
Dredge writes:
If you think bees are worth more than humans, does that mean killing a human is less immoral than killing a bee?
I think killing a human and killing a bee is equally immoral. Killing a human, however, is much more illegal.^ See "Modified by edit", below. ^
How about the killing of 150 pounds of human vs. killing 150 pounds of bees? That's a lot of bees.
I hate to advocate genocide, but leaving such up to God, I think the planet would have been a lot better off had God eliminate Noah and family also. Humanity is rather a disease upon planet Earth.
So, was God being moral in how "the flood" was executed?
Moose
Modified by edit:
Above I said "I think killing a human and killing a bee is equally immoral. Killing a human, however, is much more illegal."
I would like to change that to:
I think killing a human and killing a bee are both immoral. Considering the impact of such upon society, killing a human is much more immoral. That's why killing a human is also much more illegal.
Edited by Minnemooseus, : Modified by edit.