Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,843 Year: 4,100/9,624 Month: 971/974 Week: 298/286 Day: 19/40 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Gay Marriage as an attack on Christianity
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 572 of 1484 (802972)
03-22-2017 2:20 PM
Reply to: Message 570 by NoNukes
03-22-2017 2:03 PM


Re: The Main Points
It is fairly obvious what the equivalent solution would be. Just make the cake without making it gay specific. The problem is that you would not accept that solution.
There is nothing about the cake that is gay specific already. It's a wedding cake, that's all, and the only thing that makes it for a gay wedding is the fact that it is ordered for that purpose. That is what engages the baker's conscience. There is no need to put a couple of male dolls on it, or female, if it is known to be for a gay wedding that's already the problem. As has been said umpteen times on this thread already.
What is this need to smear the Christian bakers who are only acting on their understanding of God's requirement?: You can punish them to a pulp if you want, fine them into the poorhouse, drive them out of business, but what's the point of all this insinuating lying garbage against them/us? I 'wouldn't accept" this or that? What's the need of this kind of insinuating lie?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 570 by NoNukes, posted 03-22-2017 2:03 PM NoNukes has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 576 by PaulK, posted 03-22-2017 2:29 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 578 by Percy, posted 03-22-2017 2:40 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 574 of 1484 (802975)
03-22-2017 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 573 by Percy
03-22-2017 2:20 PM


Re: The Main Points
Lots of miscommunication, my fault OK.
The situations are the same as far as the baker's conscience is concerned and that is thatl.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 573 by Percy, posted 03-22-2017 2:20 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 579 by Percy, posted 03-22-2017 2:52 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 575 of 1484 (802976)
03-22-2017 2:26 PM
Reply to: Message 571 by PaulK
03-22-2017 2:05 PM


Re: The Main Points
bla bla bla
How about writing Tatchell and finding out what he thinks?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 571 by PaulK, posted 03-22-2017 2:05 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 577 by PaulK, posted 03-22-2017 2:33 PM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 580 of 1484 (802985)
03-22-2017 3:01 PM
Reply to: Message 578 by Percy
03-22-2017 2:40 PM


Re: The Main Points
As usual you are making garbage out of the point.
Jesus was always kind to sinners. What Jesus never did was treat sinners as not sinners, or advocate disobeying God's laws. He might do all kinds of things for gays, but He would not support their marrying because that is a violation of God's law.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 578 by Percy, posted 03-22-2017 2:40 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 582 by ringo, posted 03-22-2017 3:19 PM Faith has replied
 Message 591 by Percy, posted 03-22-2017 4:12 PM Faith has replied
 Message 617 by jar, posted 03-23-2017 9:55 AM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 581 of 1484 (802986)
03-22-2017 3:02 PM
Reply to: Message 579 by Percy
03-22-2017 2:52 PM


Re: The Main Points
As far as the baker's conscience goes, both the writing on the cake, and the wedding cake in the context defined, affirm the legitimacy of gay marriage, which is THE reason for refusing either of them.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 579 by Percy, posted 03-22-2017 2:52 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 592 by Percy, posted 03-22-2017 4:17 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 583 of 1484 (802990)
03-22-2017 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 582 by ringo
03-22-2017 3:19 PM


Treating sin as not sin is unkind
For ALL have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.
Jesus treated EVERYBODY as sinners - i.e. He treated everybody equally
Yes we are all sinners, every human being. Yes Jesus treated us all as sinners, because we are. As I said He never treated sin as not sin. He died to save us from sin. If sin weren't sin He wouldn't have needed to die for us. "He loved us while we were yet sinners." He loves us but He doesn't say we aren't sinners. Gays are sinners, He wouldn't say they aren't, which is essentially what some "Christian" churches are doing. He would tell them as He tells us all: Repent and believe and be saved.
To do anything to appear to treat gay marriage as legitimate, which is clearly against God's law of marriage, would itself be unkind and unloving, because anything that encourages sin in people encourages their eternal misery. Always the kind thing is to call it sin, refuse to serve it, and advise repentance and belief in Christ for salvation.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : too many typos

This message is a reply to:
 Message 582 by ringo, posted 03-22-2017 3:19 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 584 by ringo, posted 03-22-2017 3:54 PM Faith has replied
 Message 586 by Phat, posted 03-22-2017 4:01 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 585 of 1484 (802994)
03-22-2017 4:00 PM
Reply to: Message 584 by ringo
03-22-2017 3:54 PM


Gays are singling themselves out and Christians are responding to their provocations.
The Christian businesses have been there for years and along comes this law that contradicts basic Christian belief. They are just going along minding their own business when suddenly they are faced with choosing between their faith and their livelihood, as Tangle put it some posts back. So your solution is for them to give up their livelihood which has been established for years. Perhaps it will thrill you to know that that is probably what is going to happen in many cases, unjust though it is.
Oh and our eye doesn't offend us because we're in the right. The offensive eye is sin and you among others should pluck yours out.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 584 by ringo, posted 03-22-2017 3:54 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 588 by Modulous, posted 03-22-2017 4:09 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 589 by ringo, posted 03-22-2017 4:09 PM Faith has replied
 Message 595 by PaulK, posted 03-22-2017 4:24 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 587 of 1484 (802996)
03-22-2017 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 586 by Phat
03-22-2017 4:01 PM


Re: Treating sin as not sin is unkind
What?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 586 by Phat, posted 03-22-2017 4:01 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 590 of 1484 (802999)
03-22-2017 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 589 by ringo
03-22-2017 4:09 PM


Not at all. They aren't asking for anything that anybody else isn't entitled to.
No, they are asking for something THEY aren't entitled to. Marriage was designed for heterosexuals, who are capable of becoming one flesh, as objectively expressed in the conception of children who are the one flesh composed of their parents' flesh.
You are the one in sin. Pluck out your eye already.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 589 by ringo, posted 03-22-2017 4:09 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 594 by ringo, posted 03-22-2017 4:19 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 593 of 1484 (803002)
03-22-2017 4:18 PM
Reply to: Message 591 by Percy
03-22-2017 4:12 PM


Re: The Main Points
Perhaps you should ponder your last question: why isn't it? Why is it only Christian wedding services that are sued? Hm?
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 591 by Percy, posted 03-22-2017 4:12 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 601 by Percy, posted 03-22-2017 4:39 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 602 by Modulous, posted 03-22-2017 4:41 PM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 597 of 1484 (803006)
03-22-2017 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 595 by PaulK
03-22-2017 4:24 PM


In other words gays should get back in the closet.
No, they should stop doing things to provoke Chrisitans. Otherwise they can do what they want as always.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 595 by PaulK, posted 03-22-2017 4:24 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 599 by PaulK, posted 03-22-2017 4:33 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 598 of 1484 (803007)
03-22-2017 4:31 PM
Reply to: Message 594 by ringo
03-22-2017 4:19 PM


Obviously it's impossible to keep up a debate when one party makes nonsensical illogical posts such as yours.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 594 by ringo, posted 03-22-2017 4:19 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 600 by ringo, posted 03-22-2017 4:33 PM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 603 of 1484 (803013)
03-22-2017 6:19 PM
Reply to: Message 592 by Percy
03-22-2017 4:17 PM


Re: The Main Points
What interaction with a gay couple wouldn't be interpreted as affirming the legitimacy of gay marriage? How is letting them in the store or saying hello to them on the street not affirming gay marriage? Once you've singled them out for special treatment there's nowhere to draw the line.
Their belief they are married doesn't implicate me in it, I am free not to believe it. And how would I know in most cases anyway? No, it has has nothing whatever to do with the people, nothing. The writing and the cake, both involve the baker in the event that legitimizes gay marriage.
Writing a message is the only objection that makes sense. One shouldn't be compelled to write things one doesn't believe.
Nor be compelled to construct a symbol of marriage for a wedding that the baker regards as illegitimate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 592 by Percy, posted 03-22-2017 4:17 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 604 of 1484 (803014)
03-22-2017 6:25 PM
Reply to: Message 599 by PaulK
03-22-2017 4:33 PM


If you review the context of what is being said here you should find that it started with somebody saying something about CHURCHES singling out gays. I said they do not, they are responding to gay provocations, such as the demand for gay marriage, and now its legalization. There is no particular singling out of gays, it's a response to their actions that contradict Christian doctrine. Preachers also preach against all the other sins, but at the moment adulterers aren't asking to be given some special status that legally elevates them to some other category or erases their adultery.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 599 by PaulK, posted 03-22-2017 4:33 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 605 by NoNukes, posted 03-22-2017 7:51 PM Faith has replied
 Message 614 by PaulK, posted 03-23-2017 1:43 AM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 606 of 1484 (803019)
03-22-2017 8:05 PM
Reply to: Message 605 by NoNukes
03-22-2017 7:51 PM


Preachers also preach against all the other sins, but at the moment adulterers aren't asking to be given some special status that legally elevates them to some other category or erases their adultery.
Given that "special status" is merely asking for the same the cake you or I could get, your words are easily seen through.
I honestly don't understand how anyone who calls himself a Christian and presumably knows the Bible, maybe even regards it as God's word (?} can think homosexual relationships are the equivalent of heterosexual relationship in any sense at all, how God's ordinance of marriage could possibly apply to two of the same sex who are not designed for the physical union of marriage, don't qualify in the slightest, whose "union" is called sin in the Bible -- a "Christian" who on top of that criticizes and maligns other Christians who point this out and refuse to do anything to support such violations of God's principles, calling us bigots, calling it a failure of love, and even imputing to Christ Himself such ungodly views. I don't know how far a Christian can go in such an anti-Christian belief and still be a Christian, saved by God's grace, I really wonder. What is God going to do with such Christians?
If you really love homosexuals you should be telling them honestly what sin is and how it only earns us all an eternity in Hell, and encourage them to seek salvation. That's love, while justifying their sin as just a normal sexual variation is hate.
We'll happily recommend a gorgeous tiered cake to celebrate the day of their salvation, which is in fact marriage to Christ.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 605 by NoNukes, posted 03-22-2017 7:51 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 607 by Modulous, posted 03-22-2017 8:25 PM Faith has replied
 Message 608 by NoNukes, posted 03-22-2017 9:30 PM Faith has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024