Can you disprove this secular argument against evolution?

forexhr writes:I am genuinely stunned with the ability of the people in this thread to ignore the essence of my argument.

forexhr writes:I would like to remind that this thread is not about just so stories, evolutionary models, hypotheses and ad hoc hypotheses, fictional explanations... but about the physical reality of matter, or more specifically, about the share of bio-functionality in it. Matter is composed of particles. The more particles there are, the more different 3D structures can be created. With 2 particles we can create 1 3D structure, with 3 particles 2 different 3D structures, with 5 particles 12, with 15 particles 3426576, with 28 particles 153511100594603 and with 1000 particles we can create 8.37x10e3271 differnet 3D structures.(1)

forexhr writes:Hence, this is the physical reality of matter - with small number of particles you can create inconveniently large number of different 3D material structures.

forexhr writes:Regardless of what you have been taught, 'evolving' has nothing to do with populations, but with individual organisms.

forexr writes:You can repeat your mantra all you want, but it's not going to change the fact that individual organisms are what live, die, and reproduce, not populations. And in order to have evolution you need reproduction.

forexhr writes:This is not the evidence but just quotes and empty claims. You need to provide an actual, logical step by step explanation.

forexhr writes:Well the fact is that we don't know ANY hypothetical step in the hypothetical history of the evolution because nobody was there to witness it.