Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9073 total)
30 online now:
Aussie, dwise1, nwr, PaulK, ringo, Tangle, Tanypteryx (7 members, 23 visitors)
Newest Member: MidwestPaul
Post Volume: Total: 893,300 Year: 4,412/6,534 Month: 626/900 Week: 150/182 Day: 30/27 Hour: 4/8

Announcements: Security Update Released


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The TRVE history of the Flood...
Diomedes
Member (Idle past 88 days)
Posts: 973
From: Central Florida, USA
Joined: 09-13-2013


Message 148 of 1352 (804956)
04-14-2017 1:30 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by Davidjay
04-14-2017 12:07 PM


Re: Agreed, evolutionists ONLY study their theory
Yes, Pressie, again I agree with you, evolutionists narrow their field of study to living things, and not to the origins of life or the laws of the Universe. AGREED.

An over-generalization, but at least you are starting to pick things up.

They dont extrapolate their LUCK theory to other scientific fields,
They stick to whatever is alive already and then theorise from there.

Not exactly true. The fossil record is 'not alive'. But it is studied by paleontologists.

By the way, there is no such thing as an 'evolutionist'. It isn't a field of study, just a made up term by you in order to create pathetic strawman arguments.

They dont study math or time progression or history (except for millions and billions of years theology).

Actually, most individuals studying evolutionary biology have had university level math as part of their degree.

And what does 'except for millions and billions of years of theology' mean? Are you finally agreeing that the Earth and universe are billions of years old? Glad you are finally picking that up as well.

They dont have a TOE, they dont have consistency, their theory of luck and chance doesn;t help in any other field to solve anything. AGREED.

Nope. As was already conveyed to you by both myself and Tangle. Guess you are still trying to figure that one out.

A better scientific approach is seeing all the forest instead of one pet tree. Putting all things together cohesively and figuring out all of life and all of science.

That is what science does. It just has different fields of study for specializations depending on the focus area. Just because I studied electrical engineering (which I did) doesn't mean the curriculum was invalid because I didn't study as much chemical engineering. You would understand these things if you went to college, but judging by your posts, I am guessing you even completing a GED is about the limits of your abilities.

They settle in the comfort of forced indocrination in the field of biology or living organisms.

Maybe they should spend more time in churches. No forced 'indoctrination' there. Please learn to spell by the way; browsers have built in spell and grammar checks. Easy to use. And it doesn't do your arguments much justice when your posts look like they come from a remedial 3rd grade basic english class.

I think it's time for another facepalm:


This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Davidjay, posted 04-14-2017 12:07 PM Davidjay has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by Davidjay, posted 04-14-2017 11:54 PM Diomedes has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022