Utter nonsense Faith; just another example of your willful ignorance.
You say "Water sorts things" but that is where you stop. Thinking people go on to investigate how water sorts things and the thinking people realized several hundred years ago the water cannot and does not sort things in the fashion found in reality.
This is what folk have been pointing out to you in this and many other threads. There is no way your imaginary flood could sort the fossils as they exit in reality.
There is no way your imaginary flood could sort the geology as it is found in reality.
There is no way your imaginary flood could sort material by radioactive isotopes.
There is no way your imaginary flood could have happened during the lifespan of many examples you have been given.
Couldn't be that you have the wrong idea about how the laws of physics work in such a situation.
Of course it could and so thinking people looked for the evidence that the laws of physics might have worked differently in the past.
But of course, all of the evidence showed that the laws of physics have been working just as they do today and for billions of years.
They looked at the starts to see if they found evidence of the laws of physics behaving differently in the past. But what they found was that over the whole period of billions of years the laws remained the same.
They looked at geology to see if the laws had been different in the past. But of course, they found that the processes over the last few billion years here on Earth have remained the same.
The looked at the Oklo Reactor to see if the laws had been different in the past. But of course, they found that the processes over the last few billion years here on Earth have remained the same.
They looked at biology and genetics, at fossils and societies, at cities and pottery and agriculture and technology and, of course, they found that the laws of physics and genetics and geology and archeology and paleontology and biology haven't really changed over the past.
Yes Faith, we could have had the wrong idea so we checked.
There is no such thing as the KT or PT boundaries, that's all fiction based on the Geo Time Scale and since I reject all your dating systems you shouldn't pin them on me. Besides the dates I gave are nowhere near your Time Scale dates so why are you claiming they are? I absolutely reject all your dates.
And you reject all reality and truth based one what fantasy Faith?
The fact is that even the Bible proves that the Biblical Flood never happened and is just myth. That's why there are two mutually exclusive and contradictory flood tales in the Bible.
Unreliable witnesses like the Bible should not be believed when the real evidence contradicts the story.
The sorting is a secondary issue when the trilobites climb the supposed Geological Time Scale for hundreds of millions of years without changing any more than we see any creature microevolving in a few observable years in current time, same as the coelecanths, while evo theory has reptiles evolving into mammals in a time period or two. The whole thing is a big fat sham.
But sorting (and dating and reality) is an issue that absolutely, totally, completely and irrevocably proves that the Biblical flood never happened.
I think of the glaciers as following the Flood, the ice age as having been created by the climatic conditions produced in the Flood.
That's a pretty thought but that is all it is, kinda like I think of unicorns as not pure white but pinkish white.
What is the evidence that supports such as thought since nothing in the Bible suggests it as even a possibility, the reality and facts show that the last ice age ended over 10,000 years ago and the last ice age lasted for over 100,000 years. It hardly seems that there has been enough time since your imaginary flood for all that to happen.
What is your model, method, mechanism or thingamabob that would let a flood cause an ice age?
BUT WAIT!!!!!!!!!!!! There's more.
Reality shows there have been more than one ice age.
More significant, and absolute proof that the Grand Canyon is NOT and CANNOT be explained by the imaginary flood, is the existence of a horseshoe bend in the Grand Canyon.
That one feature puts PAID to the utter nonsense that the Grand Canyon is the result of some Biblical Flood.
that one is easy. You hit a stone with your staff and a spring appears. The Ark would have tons of ballast stones so all that they had to do was plunk your magic twanger froggy.
The idea that there was ever a Biblical flood is worthy only of preschool humor.
But you don't have to go 400 miles to find water that is trapped in rock. Water is in an abundant state you can find enough in the asthenosphere to fill the present oceans over 7 times.
First, water is not a state.
And you need to explain to us how you extract that water and channel it to the fountains of the deep.
Change leaves evidence. Remove the water from below ground and you will find evidence of that at the surface. San Joaquin Valley has subsided over 30 feet just from pumping irrigation water.
The people who try to market the Biblical Flood fantasy simply do not understand that change really does leave evidence and the evidence the Biblical Flood MUST leave had it happened simply does not exist.
The people that write the fantasies for Creation.com are either deluded, willfully ignorant or most likely totally dishonest and without morals.
There is nothing in either of the Biblical Flood fables that suggests mountains rising after the flood. They are simply making shit up to support their fantasy; perverting the Bible with their truly stupid additions.
™ Version 4.2
