The TRVE history of the Flood...

The last dozen or so posts I've put up on this thread are all the evidence needed for the Flood and against the Geo Time Scale. Sorry, but you and your EvC army of evos are just blowing smoke.

So all you've got is falsehood and a refusal to a knowledge the evidence.Hardly a great case.

Ha ha. The case has been made. Sorry.

Laugh at the truth all you like. You still don't have a case.That's why you don't even try to discuss the evidence.

It's been discussed to death over the last few years. You lost.

And yet, you have convinced none of us. I would hardly call that winning.

Convincing the brainwashed isn't the right criterion. The case has been made logically though denied by the local gang of evos. Sorry.

The fact that you have to ignore the evidence proves that you lost.

I've given all the evidence needed to prove the Flood. Sorry.

To prove the Flood you would actually have to answer the huge mass of evidence against it. Instead you choose to dishonestly ignore it. That doesn't prove anything you want proved.

It still don't think that big chunks of your "Age Correlations and An Old Earth..." topic(s) belong in this topic.No responses to this message, in this topic. Y'all should know where to post such replies.Adminnemooseus

Nothing dishonest about anything I said. I've made the case so there is no need to address all the other stuff. That's perfectly legitimate.

So, then. You are telling us that you have no interest in discussion.

Ya know what? At this point that is quite true. I've had more than enough of the EvC brand of "discussion." I've made my point, I proved it, that's all there is to say.

quote:

---

Nothing dishonest about anything I said.

---

You don't have a real case so instead of dealing with the evidence you just falsely claim victory. I can't see how that is anything less than an outright lie.

quote:

---

I've made the case so there is no need to address all the other stuff. That's perfectly legitimate.

---

The "other stuff" shows that you grossly misrepresented the evidence. That the strata and fossils do not support your claims - and in fact refute them. And that is on top of the other contradictory evidence that you have no viable answer to.It is NOT legitimate to ignore evidence that refutes your case. Not among people who have any regard for the truth. And that is what you are doing.