Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8915 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-20-2019 10:46 PM
25 online now:
DrJones*, dwise1, edge, kjsimons (4 members, 21 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: anglagard
Post Volume:
Total: 857,225 Year: 12,261/19,786 Month: 2,042/2,641 Week: 551/708 Day: 110/135 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Laws happened by accident ? and did Laws evolve ?
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2250
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


(3)
Message 46 of 114 (805293)
04-17-2017 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by Davidjay
04-17-2017 10:25 AM


Re: Re:The Big Bang was slow expansion, JOKE
So do also notice, that the same principle of luck permeates cosmotology so that evolutionists do have links to other theoretical non scientists.

So, it turns out you are so misinformed that you can't even misspell cosmotology properly. It's cosmetology, Dimwit. Unless you really did mean CAR COSMOTOLOGY.

You probably meant this: Cosmetology: Branches of specialty include hairstyling, skin care, cosmetics, manicures/pedicures, non permanent hair removal such as waxing and sugaring and permanent hair removal processes such as electrology and Intense Pulsed Light (IPL).

Edited by Tanypteryx, : No reason given.


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Davidjay, posted 04-17-2017 10:25 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

    
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2250
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


(2)
Message 63 of 114 (805586)
04-19-2017 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Davidjay
04-19-2017 8:27 AM


Re: Conifrmed...Laws were not by chance
Evolutionists as per usual, speak with forked tongues, as they cant figure out when the laws of the Universe came about, to them the general agreement is that they were just there.

Well, here we are in a thread you started 60 messages in and you haven't listed the "Laws of the Universe".

Why do you think "Evolutionists" are concerned with the "Laws of the Universe"?

How many "Laws of the Universe" are there?

Please give us a list of the "Laws of the Universe" in order. (in order of importance or alphabetically, either will work)

Evolution did not creat any LAWS (it just violates them because it is not science)

Did someone tell you that "Evolution" creates LAWS?

What happens if the "Laws of the Universe" are violated?

PS: Did you know that there are spell checkers that will auto-correct what you write so that you will not look quite so stupid?


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Davidjay, posted 04-19-2017 8:27 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

    
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2250
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 69 of 114 (805936)
04-21-2017 3:20 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Davidjay
04-21-2017 12:55 PM


Re: Conifrmed...Laws were not by chance
As mentioned, laws are compatible, they fit together, they have not evolved. evolution has no comment on the Laws of the Universe which were created in the BEGINNING as even the above evolutionists now admit.

Can you show us which laws are compatible, and explain what compatibility means?

Can you show us how they fit together and what that means?

Can you show us your evidence that the "Laws of the Universe" were created in the BEGINNING?

as even the above evolutionists now admit.

You are implying that the "above evolutionists" have changed their minds about this. Can you show where they ever said anything different?

Can you list the "Laws of the Universe"? Any of them?

I have proven my point. Laws are not evolving. Evolution created no laws.

No. you didn't. I can see that you think your god tells you this stuff, but it is just tinnitus.

Can you show that you have a clue what you are talking about?......LIST THE "LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE"!


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Davidjay, posted 04-21-2017 12:55 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

    
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2250
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


(1)
Message 80 of 114 (806059)
04-22-2017 12:29 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Diomedes
04-22-2017 12:15 PM


And while you are at it Davidjay, also learn how to use the spelling/grammar checks that are built into your browser. It's difficult enough to wade through his nonsensical blather; the least he could do is at least make his posts resemble something that a 3rd grader could produce.

You ask too much. Correct spelling and grammar will never improve his nonsensical blather. You are talking about a bloke who is completely daft and who can barely read, let alone talk.

He started a thread about the "Laws of the Universe" but he cannot list any of them, let alone tell us what they say and what that means.


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Diomedes, posted 04-22-2017 12:15 PM Diomedes has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by Davidjay, posted 04-24-2017 11:59 AM Tanypteryx has responded

    
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2250
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


(1)
Message 91 of 114 (806339)
04-24-2017 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by Davidjay
04-24-2017 11:59 AM


Yes, I am a science type and not ;iterary type, I prefered going into nature, and the great outdoors, or playing golf, basketball, or baseball rather than reading and being a GEEK.

Yes, it shows. I can't imagine anything worse than someone thinking you are a GEEK!

Yup I am a pecker, as I hated having to pay someone to type upf my essays and thesises etc. etc....

I have no idea what this has to do with the "Laws of the Universe" you claim to be such an expert about.

And as any true biologist knows, the FIRST LAW of Biology of the Creator, was be fruitful and multiply...

It is interesting that biologists working in all the different biological fields almost never see a need to call themselves "true biologists". It is even more interesting that I have never seen the "FIRST LAW of Biology of the Creator" listed in a single biology textbook or anywhere else for that matter in my whole life.

I may be wrong, but judging from what you have babbled so far, I think you just made that up.

Thats the LAW of the Universe, but it takes a mature audience to discuss, and so lets not discuss it HERE.

So, you don't think we should discuss the "LAW of the Universe" in a thread that you started to discuss whether the laws are accidental or evolved?

So, YOU are not mature enough to discuss it? I'm shocked!

I win again, and have answered you and added to the discussion.

Yeah, right.....Grow up!

Evolutionists dont know the REPRODUCTION LAWS let alone the laws of the UNIVERSE.

Apparently, neither do you. You listed ONE measly, made up law that you are afraid to discuss.

You are admitting that you know absolutely nothing about the "LAWS of the Universe" since you cannot even state what they are or what they mean.

I win again since you don't have the balls even tell us how many laws there are, what they say, or what they mean.


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Davidjay, posted 04-24-2017 11:59 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by Stile, posted 04-25-2017 9:38 AM Tanypteryx has acknowledged this reply

    
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2250
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


(2)
Message 103 of 114 (807030)
04-30-2017 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by Davidjay
04-30-2017 10:07 AM


Re: 'Laws did not evolve' is now a GIVEN
But Percy, they need to actually learn to say something and connect something, before I can logically and rationally and scientifically respond to them.

You are a funny guy! I see that you have proven that you don't know anything about any of the "Laws of the Universe".

You have been unable to list any of them. You have been unable to describe what a single law means. You have been unable to even tell us how many "Laws of the Universe" there are.

The thread is over 100 posts and you have proven that you are a fake. You have proven that you have absolutely no knowledge of the "Laws of the Universe".

You have gone down in flaming ruins as you flounder around even trying to make a coherent statement. You cannot spell, you have no idea of grammar, you cannot construct a coherent sentence. You have not been able to communicate anything but your own ignorance. You clearly cannot understand the simplest explanations from your opponents.

I will say one thing, you have left no doubts whatsoever, that you don't know what you are talking about and that you can't make a reasonable argument.


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by Davidjay, posted 04-30-2017 10:07 AM Davidjay has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by Davidjay, posted 04-30-2017 2:29 PM Tanypteryx has responded

    
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2250
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


(2)
Message 107 of 114 (807063)
04-30-2017 3:23 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by Davidjay
04-30-2017 2:29 PM


Re: 'Laws did not evolve' is now a GIVEN
Please stick to the topic, we are discussing how the laws of physics and creation came about.

This is directly on topic. YOU started the topic and so far the only "GIVEN" is that you don't know what you are talking about. You cannot name any of the "Laws of the Universe", let alone tell us how many there are or what they mean.

Evolutionists beginning is the Big Magic Bang or Big Explosion billions or trillions of years ago,

See, you can't get even the simplest things correct.

There was no "Magic" involved in the Big Bang and there was NO EXPLOSION.....spacetime is expanding not exploding.

And you have been told over and over and over and over that the Universe is billions of years old not trillions.

If you want to discuss things with people who know how science works you shouldn't try to convince them that they believe things that they do not.

So far you have convinced us that you have no clue what you are talking about.


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Davidjay, posted 04-30-2017 2:29 PM Davidjay has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by Davidjay, posted 04-30-2017 6:46 PM Tanypteryx has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019