In a world where nationalism and religion and color of skin are being used to separate people, I think it would be beneficial if we discussed how the theory of evolution is being used to promote such a division between people. For evolution teaches that a species or kind divides from its original species into a new viable species. Or in human terms .....a better species or kind of human... a superior human race.
For although all wars are fought for economic reasons, the powers of individual countries try to sell their news wars, on the fact or propaganda that the other country is inferior or evil or is in danger of getting stronger than them etc. etc.
The underlying rationale is that the local countries bloodlines or DNA or genes mutated in that countries borders, is somehow superior to those humans in another country.
This they know is a forced doctrine in biology as taught in all the worldly universities, and fits in perfectly with their propaganda means of promoting their wars. Everyone wants to feel superior to others, its part of their self esteem, seemingly being BETTER than others. The leaders of these countries can feed this competitive waring motivation to their so called superior or chosen people... so they feel a need to go to war and sacrifice all for their small nationalistic patriotic country.
Absolutely, David, you've hit the nail on the head. Before "The Origin of Species" was published in 1859, the world was peaceful and egalitarian, functioning on ideas like one person one vote democracy, socialism, human rights and the equality of all people under the law.
Then, after this evil publication, the Europeans rapidly established a feudal system and the concept of aristocratic and royal bloodlines, so those who believed themselves of superior lines would marry amongst themselves, and treat others as their inferiors, and exercise their biological rights of Kingship and Lordship; and nations started to regard themselves as unequal, and the first wars began.
The disease spread. For example, when the evil tract was translated into Hindi, the caste system was invented in India; a strict, unequal hierarchy based on the Darwinian concept of fitness and bloodlines. Then wars began on the subcontinent for the first time.
All over the world hereditary Chiefdoms, Kingdoms and Empires sprang up for the first time, based on bloodlines, superiority and inferiority, concepts that had never existed before. Bloody struggles followed everywhere, as we see now in the Middle-East, where the Sunni Darwinians and Shia Darwinians slaughter each other in a struggle for dominance.
Darwinian evil is truly abroad, and what can we do? Fortunately, there are people with great insight in this world, like you, dear David, so there is hope. For a start, I recommend that, like the Nazis, we should ban the evil book "Origin of Species". We must try to get back to the pre-Darwinian ideal of the eighteenth century and before. Bringing back the highly egalitarian African slave trade might be a next step toward ridding ourselves of this ugly modern racism and then we could go forward from there.
Re: .Another evolutionary LIE.... humans alone interbreed only among themselves
Chir, again trying to get away from the truth that evolution is a branching, that in and of itself means it is a racist doctrine, ... states a HUGE LIE "Humans have always been a single interbreeding population"
Study this insanity, Chir trying to make an exception out of humans says, that humans inbreed only among themselves. An new breakthrough in evolutionary theory just compsed by Chir, to evade the guilt of racism. He says they have 'always been'...meaning from the Beginning humans were separated. Read his insanity again....
Your foolish theory doesnt allow you to make an EXCEPTION and articifically magically say that humans are an exception and that humans only are inbreed.
Lets see evolutionists tried to say primates are our cousins and grandparents and ancestors, meaning apes and chimps... even though their theory calls this evolution and branching and evolving new species.
They say the branch has always been there, no branch below ever branched with humans.
All this to evade the guilt of having a racist doctrione as their cornerstone.
I repeat evolutionists play semantic games and will LIE to defend their theory and illusion.
I win agin, logic wins, consistency wins, evolutionary exceptions are ridiculous..... and DESPERATE to say the least, its a blatant L**
I tried Google translate, but it just seemed confused by the above. Can anyone here translate this into English for the rest of us?
Evolutionary biology, or theoritical biologist or false scientists,……
That's a very multi-racial group of people you're trying to describe. It's a pity you didn't look at the diversity of names on all of those research papers that you've never read in the course of accumulating your complete lack of knowledge of the subject that you have chosen to enlighten the world about.
……hate to consider the effects of their theories, and pretend that they are just researchers of luck and chance and that their theories have no effect ...... on anything or anybody. They say they make no judgments of the cause and effects of their dementias.
Take any standard definition of biological evolutionary theory, David, and tell us which part of it you think is prescriptive, and why?
If you can't find any part of the theory that is prescriptive, then could you explain why you started this thread and continue to appear to claim that it is prescriptive?
If you don't think it's prescriptive, then what is it in a description of the living world as coming about due to descent with modification directed by natural selection that would lead people to racism? As all living groups of humans are, by definition, "fit" in biological terms (otherwise they wouldn't be here), what makes you conclude that different regional groups should be given different values according to evolutionary theory? Ignorance of the theory?
Agreed, the demonic transition pic was not done in class or in the spirit of honest debate.
How would you know what that is?
First of all, I would hope ALL of us deem racism as negative.
You are a supporter and promoter of the Old Testament, which is a racist, pro-genocide tract. You are anti- Midianite.
Most moral people do, but that is our supposed value judgment HERE and on which I have proceeded further from. Racism as negative and against our human values of cooperation and even survival.... is our GIVEN
Moses, your lawgiver, would not agree.
And they brought the captives, and the prey, and the spoil, unto Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and unto the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by Jordan near Jericho.
13 And Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and all the princes of the congregation, went forth to meet them without the camp.
14 And Moses was wroth with the officers of the host, with the captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, which came from the battle.
15 And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?
16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord.
17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
Just like the Islamic State people recently.
Right ? Or do some evolutionists disagree with this statment against racism.
I think not, so our judgment or moral I assume is that ALL of us are against racism ?
Unless someone steps out of the shadows and posts their agreement with racism.
I think you should step out of the shadows, David, and admit that this thread has been a low attempt by you to conceal your own racism by accusing others.