Evolution is a racist doctrine

Has anyone told you lately that you're spouting pure bull****?By the way, my Ph.D. track was half in the fields of fossil man and human osteology, but included a lot of study of human races.I've been there and know what's going on in some of the "evolutionist" fields of study, and it makes it really easy to spot your ignorant, bigoted bull****.

More nonsense.I had a graduate level course in Human Races as part of my Ph.D. study. We learned that 1) races are essentially meaningless overall, and 2) that races are largely adaptations to local climates.Try reading a book on races not written be a creationist crank and see what anthropologists really say.

Sure it can. And it has in this thread.You seem to have some problem reading and taking in the posts which contradict your claims. Nothing being said here seems to have any effect on your a priori mindset.So once again, you're not debating, your preaching. You're certainly not here to learn anything!

Are you familiar with the scientific term, "clines?"When you become familiar with that term you might apply it to what scientists actually write about races, rather than what you have concocted in your fevered imagination.Edited by Coyote, : pre-coffee misspeeling

You keep repeating yourself with no effort to debate.You're nothing but a preacher!

Spouting nonsense is neither a "win" nor likely to lead to converts to your twisted false reality.

Wrong (again). Same as usual.Our common ancestor was neither an ape nor a monkey. That common ancestor gave rise to subsequent primates that became apes (including humans) and monkeys.

Correct.When you actually study human races, rather than numerology and other failed doctrines, you find that there are no "pure" races. Rather there are a dozen or so "classical" racial traits (e.g., skin color, hair form) and a larger number of non-classical traits (blood types, fingerprint patterns). Most of these vary somewhat independently from one another and are found in clines.A good discussion is here:http://anthro.palomar.edu/vary/vary_3.htmAnd the conclusion of that disussion:

These patterns of ABO, Rh, and Diego blood type distributions are not similar to those for skin color or other so-called "racial" traits. The implication is that the specific causes responsible for the distribution of human blood types have been different than those for other traits that have been commonly employed to categorize people into "races." Since it would be possible to divide up humanity into radically different groupings using blood typing instead of other genetically inherited traits such as skin color, we have more conclusive evidence that the commonly used typological model for understanding human variation is scientifically unsound.

​

The more we study the precise details of human variation, the more we understand how complex are the patterns. They cannot be easily summarized or understood. Yet, this hard-earned scientific knowledge is generally ignored in most countries because of more demanding social and political concerns. As a result, discrimination based on presumed "racial" groups still continues. It is important to keep in mind that this "racial" classification often has more to do with cultural and historical distinctions than it does with biology. In a very real sense, "race" is a distinction that is created by culture not biology.

Davidjay, your reading comprehension appears to be sorely lacking, as does your ability to entertain ideas other than those frozen in place in your closed mind.See the following:

Chimps and monkeys are not in our ancestry. If you could read and not just cough up creationist talking points you would see that these are all descended from common ancestors. Makes a big difference, but you obviously are unable to comprehend it. There is a trunk at the far left. But if you want another view, here it is: Nonsense. Here is a list of transitional fossils for you not to read.List of transitional fossils - Wikipedia You have yet to establish racism. You have made a lot of vacuous claims, but that's normal for creationists. Have any real-world evidence? Only if you are dull enough to miss out on what the theory of evolution actually says, as opposed to the version of the theory that has taken over your fevered mind.And can't or won't understand the illustrations I have posted.By the way, you have become a caricature of yourself. A Poe couldn't do any better.

See the chart: Bullshit. They denied your brain-dead notion that branching must involve racism. You have claimed this over and over, but never supported it with evidence. Several posters have supplied evidence showing you are wrong. And as usual, you have ignored that evidence.

How many times must we post the trees before you deign to notice?Or are you ducking, dodging and weaving in this thread also?

That's not what he said and you know (or should know) it.You're being nothing but a dishonest troll.

With statements like that you reveal yourself as a pure troll. I can't even be charitable and call you terminally deluded--you're trolling. Read the various charts and trees. You expect us to do your research for you when all you do in response is to bray like a jackass? More trolling.