And you have been told before many times that the Flood is a much better explanation for this sort of example. SO much better, so much more sensible.
And yet on The Great Creationist Fossil Failure thread, when we came up with numerous examples of fossil distribution that geologists can easily explain but flood creationists cannot, your response was:
I don't know why there seems to be this apparent sorting
I have the usual guesses..
So guesswork, supposition and goddidit versus actual observations that match the geochronological data. Is that how you define much better and sensible?
See you there if you want to support your views...
Yep - you can walk from one end of the Adelaide Geosyncline to the other, 800+km of sediments and not see a single fossil apart from some stromatalites and maybe some very rare Ediacara and trilobites. We can do some geochronology and find these rocks as pre-Cambrian so it makes sense that there are no fossils of more complex life. Your answer - it's an illusion!!!
I note how you stay away from the threads like the Creationist Fossil Failure and the Age Correlation threads because you simply don't have any answers to very simple observations that are easily explained by scientists.