Faith writes:
And you have been told before many times that the Flood is a much better explanation for this sort of example. SO much better, so much more sensible.
And yet on
The Great Creationist Fossil Failure thread, when we came up with numerous examples of fossil distribution that geologists can easily explain but flood creationists cannot, your response was:
Faith writes:
I don't know why there seems to be this apparent sorting
and
I have the usual guesses..
So guesswork, supposition and goddidit versus actual observations that match the geochronological data. Is that how you define much better and sensible?
See you there if you want to support your views...