Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 72 (9010 total)
46 online now:
frako, PaulK, ringo, Tangle (4 members, 42 visitors)
Newest Member: Burrawang
Post Volume: Total: 881,669 Year: 13,417/23,288 Month: 347/795 Week: 48/95 Day: 2/11 Hour: 1/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Evidence of the flood
Member (Idle past 167 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004

Message 431 of 899 (819627)
09-13-2017 3:40 PM
Reply to: Message 235 by ringo
09-09-2017 11:55 AM

ringo writes:

It looks to me like He was saying that believing without evidence is also acceptable. There's no clear indication of preference"

Wat? So all this time I thought it was a example of how it was preferable to believe in the absence of evidence according to traditional Christian teachings. Silly me.

Kinda like when Jesus told that roman soldier that his faith has healed his son because he believed without seeing.

Silly me all this time I thought that was the whole damn point. The roman soldier who was a pagan btw was told that it was his faith without seeing NOT well it really doesn't matter if you see me do it or not no big diff.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by ringo, posted 09-09-2017 11:55 AM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 432 by ringo, posted 09-13-2017 3:47 PM 1.61803 has acknowledged this reply

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020