Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9071 total)
69 online now:
kjsimons, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Tangle, vimesey (5 members, 64 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Post Volume: Total: 892,997 Year: 4,109/6,534 Month: 323/900 Week: 29/150 Day: 2/27 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Evidence of the flood
Member (Idle past 731 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004

Message 431 of 899 (819627)
09-13-2017 3:40 PM
Reply to: Message 235 by ringo
09-09-2017 11:55 AM

ringo writes:

It looks to me like He was saying that believing without evidence is also acceptable. There's no clear indication of preference"

Wat? So all this time I thought it was a example of how it was preferable to believe in the absence of evidence according to traditional Christian teachings. Silly me.

Kinda like when Jesus told that roman soldier that his faith has healed his son because he believed without seeing.

Silly me all this time I thought that was the whole damn point. The roman soldier who was a pagan btw was told that it was his faith without seeing NOT well it really doesn't matter if you see me do it or not no big diff.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by ringo, posted 09-09-2017 11:55 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 432 by ringo, posted 09-13-2017 3:47 PM 1.61803 has seen this message

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022